geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] implement jakarta spec apis
Date Sat, 04 May 2019 17:28:10 GMT
We mainly fork for legal reasons and defaults so name is probably not
critical while we respect module names.

Btw do we do it in gitbox? Svn had some limitations by the past for
contributions.

Le sam. 4 mai 2019 à 17:47, Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@liferay.com> a
écrit :

> One thing to consider is there may be cases where it is desirable to
> retain the javax API alongside some extra jakarta packages & types.
>
> For example, for JAX-RS you may wish to add some newly defined jakarta
> types (part of a new spec) which interact over the original javax API.
>
> The result might be that "Jakarta EE REST" (a fictitious name for next
> JAX-RS) might contain a subset of packages which, in combination with JAXRS
> v2.1, also qualifies as "Jakarata EE Rest".
>
> - Ray
>
> On Sat, May 4, 2019 at 11:26 AM Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@liferay.com>
> wrote:
>
>> so is this a matter of forking all the current specs into the new
>> namespace? Or is the intention to completely change the packages in-place?
>>
>> - Ray
>>
>> On Fri, May 3, 2019 at 1:58 PM Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hmm
>>>
>>> My understanding was it was getting under eclipse license as well and
>>> was fully donated but can have missed some details.
>>>
>>> If we cant reuse them let's just create new ones and fix module name for
>>> others.
>>>
>>> specs/ is fine since it is the same for us IMHO
>>>
>>> Le ven. 3 mai 2019 à 18:24, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> a écrit
:
>>>
>>>> No, it is not the same. microprofile specs are licensed under ALv2 and
>>>> we know all the legal details.
>>>> For the EE specs this is by far not the same. We don't even know
>>>> exactly what parts did yet get donated by Oracle to the EF.
>>>>
>>>> LieGrue,
>>>> strub
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> > Am 03.05.2019 um 18:12 schrieb Romain Manni-Bucau <
>>>> rmannibucau@gmail.com>:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi
>>>> >
>>>> > Idnt it the exact same as for microprofile? So we dont do?
>>>> >
>>>> > Le ven. 3 mai 2019 à 16:21, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
a
>>>> écrit :
>>>> > I've started tinkering something under specs/branches/jakarta.
>>>> > It's wip but have to rush out for a few hours now.
>>>> > Will continue later today.
>>>> >
>>>> > LieGrue,
>>>> > strub
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > > Am 03.05.2019 um 15:50 schrieb Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:
>>>> > >
>>>> > > hi folks!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > You might have read todays post from Mike Milinkovich.
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> https://eclipse-foundation.blog/2019/05/03/jakarta-ee-java-trademarks/
>>>> > >
>>>> > > It basically says that Jakarta will not be able to change a single
>>>> bit in the current spec apis under the javax.* package.
>>>> > > Any change has to be done in a different package.
>>>> > > The Jakarta people over at Eclipse already did some voting and
the
>>>> new package name will be jakarta.*
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thus I would like to recommend to use our IP clean geronimo-specs
>>>> to setup a new project for the EE8 specs under the jakarta.* package name.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > I'll go forward and create a branch starting with the most
>>>> important specs.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Any feedback and help is welcome!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > LieGrue,
>>>> > > strub
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>> --
>> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>>  (@rotty3000)
>> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>>  (@Liferay)
>> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
>> (@OSGiAlliance)
>>
>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>  (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
>

Mime
View raw message