geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: OSGi review of the geronimo-validation_2.0_spec api
Date Fri, 21 Sep 2018 14:57:28 GMT
Looks good to me too but only did simple tests

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le ven. 21 sept. 2018 à 16:39, Raymond Auge <raymond.auge@liferay.com> a
écrit :

> Hey Mark,
>
> Everything looks good for me.
>
> Sincerely,
> - Ray
>
> On Fri, Sep 21, 2018 at 8:44 AM Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> hi folks (especially Raymond and Romain)
>> Could you please check if the OSGi bits in the validation-2.0 spec module
>> are proper?
>>
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/trunk/geronimo-validation_2.0_spec/
>>
>> Would love to release it as we need it for the upcoming Apache BVal-2.0
>> release.
>>
>>
>> txs and LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>
> --
> *Raymond Augé* <http://www.liferay.com/web/raymond.auge/profile>
>  (@rotty3000)
> Senior Software Architect *Liferay, Inc.* <http://www.liferay.com>
>  (@Liferay)
> Board Member & EEG Co-Chair, OSGi Alliance <http://osgi.org>
> (@OSGiAlliance)
>

Mime
View raw message