geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Connector issues
Date Fri, 28 Sep 2018 13:57:34 GMT
Hi Jon,

I experienced that kind of "surprise" in recent jvm since gc is way more
aggressive - cause lambda are way more memory consuming ;). This lead to
this kind of issue where the GC happens before the object should actually
be finalizable.
I suspect we need to rework the AutoConnectionTracker to take into account
these new behaviors and actually take into consideration the lifecycle of
the underlying connection.

Maybe I got it wrong but I see the ability to disable the proxying as a
quickfix/workaround - which is ok - but it means we need to fix the source
anyway as a long term solution. Am I understanding it right? If so we need
to ensure to keep the reference until the connection is released at least
and ensure it was not closed in the pool (kind of testOnXXX).
Also wonder if there is anything related to geronimo since you cc-ed it.
IIRC this logic is only in TomEE, no?

side note: reference queue is supposed thread safe yes.

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book
<https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>


Le ven. 28 sept. 2018 à 15:49, Jonathan Gallimore <
jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> a écrit :

> Hi Folks,
>
> I have been looking into some issues with TomEE using Websphere MQ,
> specifically issues where XA resources are returning a -7 error during a
> transaction commit when the system is under load. The -7 error indicates
> that the resource is closed.
>
> The result of this error seems to be resources staying in the system
> somehow associated with the connection, and subsequently, these can't be
> enlisted in transactions (because they are closed).
>
> The stacktrace is like this, and happens over and over again as the server
> attempts to process more messages from the queue.
>
> WARN  Transaction- Unable to enlist XAResource
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.WrapperNamedXAResource@3dd56e90,
> errorCode: -7
> javax.transaction.xa.XAException: The method 'xa_start' has failed with
> errorCode '-7' due to the resource being closed.
>         at com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiXAResource.start(JmqiXAResource.java:946)
> ~[com.ibm.mq.jmqi.jar:7.5.0.5 - p750-005-150424]
>         at com.ibm.mq.connector.xa.XARWrapper.start(XARWrapper.java:581)
> ~[com.ibm.mq.connector.jar:7.5.0.5-p750-005-150424]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.WrapperNamedXAResource.start(WrapperNamedXAResource.java:111)
> ~[geronimo-transaction-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.transaction.manager.TransactionImpl.enlistResource(TransactionImpl.java:209)
> [geronimo-transaction-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.TransactionEnlistingInterceptor.getConnection(TransactionEnlistingInterceptor.java:60)
> [geronimo-connector-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.TransactionCachingInterceptor.getConnection(TransactionCachingInterceptor.java:101)
> [geronimo-connector-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.ConnectionHandleInterceptor.getConnection(ConnectionHandleInterceptor.java:43)
> [geronimo-connector-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.TCCLInterceptor.getConnection(TCCLInterceptor.java:39)
> [geronimo-connector-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.ConnectionTrackingInterceptor.getConnection(ConnectionTrackingInterceptor.java:66)
> [geronimo-connector-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.AbstractConnectionManager.allocateConnection(AbstractConnectionManager.java:81)
> [geronimo-connector-3.1.4.jar:3.1.4]
>         at
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createManagedJMSConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:194)
> [com.ibm.mq.connector.jar:7.5.0.5-p750-005-150424]
>         at
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnectionInternal(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:153)
> [com.ibm.mq.connector.jar:7.5.0.5-p750-005-150424]
>         at
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:138)
> [com.ibm.mq.connector.jar:7.5.0.5-p750-005-150424]
>         at
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:123)
> [com.ibm.mq.connector.jar:7.5.0.5-p750-005-150424]
>
> The issue itself bears some resemblance to these posts:
>
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Unable-to-enlist-XAResource-error-td4666552.html
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/Does-tomEE-issue-double-rollbacks-td4666090.html
>
> http://tomee-openejb.979440.n4.nabble.com/errorcode-100-when-using-websphere-MQ-with-tomee-td4666519.html
>
> com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiXAResource has a isClosed field, and this is set when
> close_internal() is called. I tracked this call using AspectJ, and it
> appeared to happen here:
>
> com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiXAResource.close_internal(JmqiXAResource.java:296),
> com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiXAResource.close(JmqiXAResource.java:423),
> com.ibm.mq.jmqi.JmqiXAResource.close(JmqiXAResource.java:410),
> com.ibm.msg.client.wmq.internal.WMQXASession.close(WMQXASession.java:163),
>
> com.ibm.msg.client.jms.internal.JmsSessionImpl.close(JmsSessionImpl.java:375),
>
> com.ibm.msg.client.jms.internal.JmsSessionImpl.close(JmsSessionImpl.java:303),
> com.ibm.mq.jms.MQSession.close(MQSession.java:298),
>
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ManagedConnectionImpl.destroy(ManagedConnectionImpl.java:298),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.MCFConnectionInterceptor.returnConnection(MCFConnectionInterceptor.java:67),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.XAResourceInsertionInterceptor.returnConnection(XAResourceInsertionInterceptor.java:47),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.AbstractSinglePoolConnectionInterceptor.internalReturn(AbstractSinglePoolConnectionInterceptor.java:148),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.AbstractSinglePoolConnectionInterceptor.returnConnection(AbstractSinglePoolConnectionInterceptor.java:129),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.TransactionEnlistingInterceptor.returnConnection(TransactionEnlistingInterceptor.java:118),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.TransactionCachingInterceptor.returnConnection(TransactionCachingInterceptor.java:119),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.ConnectionHandleInterceptor.returnConnection(ConnectionHandleInterceptor.java:71),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.TCCLInterceptor.returnConnection(TCCLInterceptor.java:50),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.ConnectionTrackingInterceptor.returnConnection(ConnectionTrackingInterceptor.java:91),
>
> org.apache.openejb.resource.AutoConnectionTracker.setEnvironment(AutoConnectionTracker.java:62),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.ConnectionTrackingInterceptor.getConnection(ConnectionTrackingInterceptor.java:65),
>
> org.apache.geronimo.connector.outbound.AbstractConnectionManager.allocateConnection(AbstractConnectionManager.java:81),
>
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createManagedJMSConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:194),
>
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnectionInternal(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:153),
>
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:138),
>
> com.ibm.mq.connector.outbound.ConnectionFactoryImpl.createConnection(ConnectionFactoryImpl.java:123),
>
> The interesting part here is the
> org.apache.openejb.resource.AutoConnectionTracker.setEnvironment() call,
> which is destroying connections where the proxy for the connection no
> longer has any references. I.e. if you had some code that did this:
>
> ----
> Connection conn = connectionFactory.createConnection(); // conn is
> actually a proxy to the connection
> // do work
>
> conn = null; // or conn is out of scope
> ----
>
> note that conn.close() is not called. The reference count to the proxy is
> now zero, so it counts as abandoned, and the next call to
> createConnection() destroys the associated connection. However, if all this
> happens in a transacted method, the JmqiXAResource is still enlisted with
> the transaction. So when the transaction goes to commit, it fails, because
> the JmqiXAResource is closed. The resource is still associated with a
> ManagedConnectionInfo object through ManagedConnectionInfo.xares
> (WrapperNamedXAResource). xaResource (XARWrapper - part of the RAR).theXAR
> (JmqiXAResource - part of the RAR). The ManagedConnectionInfo object
> somehow comes back to the pool after the rollback, and gets used again,
> with the TransactionImpl.enlistResource() call failing as above.
>
> I suspect that we're seeing this under load as GC will be taking place
> more often and calls to createConnection() will be happening more
> frequently.
>
> The connection proxies themselves don't do much - only calls to finalize()
> and clone() are caught. I propose this patch to allow the proxies to be
> disabled (the current behaviour is still the default):
> https://github.com/apache/tomee/pull/174 and welcome feedback.
>
> Running this specific case with proxies disabled has yielded positive
> results. I'll try and extend this and reproduce it in a test case as well.
> I'm wondering if AutoConnectionTracker's use of ReferenceQueue is thread
> safe. Do anyone have any thoughts on this?
>
> Cheers
>
> Jon
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message