geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Bruno Baptista <bruno...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Safegard status
Date Fri, 07 Sep 2018 06:50:20 GMT
Hi Romain,

Dropping failsafe altogether seems quite a big task, between 
re-implementation and testing. Would start on the support of 
Microprofile Fault Tolerance 1.2 right away and migrate bits of failsafe 
along the way, work for you guys?

Cheers.

Bruno Baptista
http://twitter.com/brunobat_


On 30/08/2018 11:00, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote:
> Hi Bruno,
>
> Nothing crazy AFAIK, the only task I have in mind (but is not yet 
> started) was to drop failsafe dependency to align this library on 
> other geronimo ones (dep free)
> and own the implementation.
>
> Feel free to grab any task you want.
>
> Romain Manni-Bucau
> @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> | Blog 
> <https://rmannibucau.metawerx.net/> | Old Blog 
> <http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github 
> <https://github.com/rmannibucau> | LinkedIn 
> <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Book 
> <https://www.packtpub.com/application-development/java-ee-8-high-performance>
>
>
> Le jeu. 30 août 2018 à 11:58, brunobat@gmail.com 
> <mailto:brunobat@gmail.com> <brunobat@gmail.com 
> <mailto:brunobat@gmail.com>> a écrit :
>
>     Hi,
>     I'm interested in contributing to Geronimo Safegard and help to
>     add the new features in the upcoming Fault Tolerance 1.2 Spec.
>     Is there any work being executed or currently planed for this library?
>     Cheers!
>     -- 
>     Bruno Baptista
>     http://twitter.com/brunobat_
>


Mime
View raw message