geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <>
Subject Re: Safeguard without MP-Config?
Date Sat, 25 Nov 2017 18:56:06 GMT
Hi RĂ¼diger!

I think it would be fine if it could operate without MP Config.  I was
actually thinking that configuration could be more of an SPI, rather than a
hard requirement.  E.g. one impl for MP Config, another for ConfigJSR, and
maybe a default one with system properties enabled?

And you are correct, that was my strawman placeholder to solve it, but
agree that it will not work 100%

If you want to create a pull request, first fork then make your changes in your
fork.  You should then see an option in github to raise a PR.


On Sat, Nov 25, 2017 at 1:03 PM <> wrote:

> Hey guys
> Should Safeguard run even without a MP-Config implementation? I think it
> would be cool if it did.
> Method `ExecutionPlanFactory#enableNonFallbacksForMicroProfile` looks a
> little bit like it tries to, but line 141 catches only
> `ClassNotFoundException`. If it would also catch `NoClassDefFoundError` and
> `ExceptionInInitializerError`, it would actually work.
> I could create a pull request, but I can't see how?
> RĂ¼diger
> BTW: On
> there's a broken link to the mailing lists. It's falsely `
> <>, but it should be `
> <>. I don't have rights for
> the wiki.

View raw message