geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "John D. Ament" <johndam...@apache.org>
Subject RESULTS (was Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo Spec JCDI 2.0 v1.0.1)
Date Sun, 03 Sep 2017 12:18:57 GMT
All,

Vote passes with 4 binding +1's from Mark, Alan, Romain and myself.

I'll wrap up the release process shortly.

John

On Sat, Sep 2, 2017 at 1:03 PM Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:

> +1 for releasing it.
>
> And please do NOT remove the run_sigtest.sh script!
>
> Most people will not need it, but it is a precious script for people who
> want to verify/make sure that our version of the spec does really fit the
> official specs! And those people will also know where to get the official
> artifact from.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 31.08.2017 um 16:50 schrieb Alan Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>:
> >
> > +1 on releasing as is
> >
> > The notice and removal of the run_sigtest.sh file can happen later, if
> you wish.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> >> On Aug 31, 2017, at 7:04 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> It looks like there's a few other errors in the NOTICE file.  If you
> want I can re-roll with the fixes.
> >>
> >> Sigtests were run as a part of
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6553 there were no sig
> changes in this release.  I'm actually not set up to run sigtests (and not
> sure its relevance to this release).
> >>
> >> The tag can be found at
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.0.1/
> >>
> >> John
> >>
> >> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 9:50 AM Alan Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
> >> Thanks.  A few questions:
> >>      • What is the tag for this release?
> >>      • Do we want to include run_sigtest.sh and not the requisite test
> jars?
> >>      • If the answer is yes, should we include a README that explains
> how to get the test jars?
> >>      • Should the NOTICE file have 2017 instead of 2015?
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>> On Aug 31, 2017, at 3:19 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for the reminder Alan.  Fixed, key is present now.
> >>>
> >>> John
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Aug 31, 2017 at 2:26 AM Alan Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
> >>> John, is your key in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/KEYS?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Alan
> >>>
> >>>> On Aug 30, 2017, at 5:10 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Hi All
> >>>>
> >>>> I was running the steps needed to release JCDI 2.0 Spec v1.0.1.
> There's only a couple small changes in this release:
> >>>>
> >>>> - Handle CDIProvider per the spec (cache the provider, lazily call
> the impl)
> >>>> - Added a @since 2.0 on setObserverMethod
> >>>>
> >>>> Staging Repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1036/
> >>>> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1036/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec/1.0.1/geronimo-jcdi_2.0_spec-1.0.1-source-release.zip
> >>>> (sha1, asc, md5 are next to this file)
> >>>>
> >>>> I'll leave this vote open at least 72 hours, hopefully get 3 binding
> +1's by then.
> >>>>
> >>>> Here's my own +1 to release
> >>>>
> >>>> [ ] +1 ship it
> >>>> [ ] +/- 0 don't care
> >>>> [ ] -1 don't ship because...
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message