geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DRAFT] Announcement for Geronimo Config release
Date Sun, 17 Sep 2017 06:06:45 GMT
"MP specific specification"? MP 1.0 not being anything special (just
referencing EE without bringing more consistency or features) it can work
and be less ambiguous than "subcomponent" which means not much to me, wdyt?

Le 17 sept. 2017 05:05, "David Blevins" <david.blevins@gmail.com> a écrit :

> On Sep 15, 2017, at 5:43 PM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Fri, Sep 15, 2017 at 2:36 PM David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sep 14, 2017, at 3:54 AM, John D. Ament <johndament@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> as well as being the first release of a MicroProfile specification
>> implementation here at Apache
>>
>>
>> Note TomEE is the first MP implementation at Apache.  We intentionally
>> defined MP 1.0 as a subset of the WebProfile so all servers were by default
>> MP compatible.  TomEE, WildFly, Payara and Liberty were all used in the MP
>> 1.0 Conference demo and initial presentations.
>>
>>
> Sure, are you asking me to rephrase it? I'm referring to the individual
> components, rather than the overall MicroProfile umbrella.
>
>
> Yeah, maybe use "first implementation of a MicroProfile sub-component here
> at Apache" or something similar.
>
> MP 1.0, 1.1 are all MicroProfile specifications as well, so someone with
> that perspective will read "MicroProfile specification implementation"
> differently than intended.
>
>
> -David
>
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message