geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] retire/EOL the Geronimo Server part?
Date Wed, 30 Aug 2017 19:11:09 GMT
As already discussed multiple times +1


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<https://blog-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com> | Old Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | JavaEE Factory
<https://javaeefactory-rmannibucau.rhcloud.com>

2017-08-30 21:09 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:

> Picking this up and pushing it further!
>
> After discussing this topic many times and finding no one willing to spend
> time to actively evolve nor even maintain the Geronimo Server part I'd say
> we should finally call a VOTE:
>
> This is a VOTE to announce the EOL the Geronimo Server parts, mostly
> * https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/
> * https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/gshell/
>
> We will also have to update our site, moving most of the current stuff to
> a 'legacy' area and rework it to focus on the new project agenda: to serve
> common EE components for other ASF projects.
>
> We also have a directory which contains binaries (jars) which don't even
> have a license information.
> We should absolutely get rid of them anyway from our repo!
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/repository/
>
>
> Note that this vote is only about the Geroniom Server but NOT about the
> shared components.
> Those components will be further maintained - or moved to a different
> project later.
>
> This includes, but is not limited to, the following Geronimo parts:
> * the specs
> * genesis (parents for xbean and specs)
> * xbean
> * the components javamail, transaction, config
> Those parts WILL STAY,
>
> So please VOTE:
>
> [+1] Publicly announce that the Geroniom Server is EOL (End of Life) and
> will not further be maintained but that the Geronimo Project will from now
> on focus on reusable Java Enterprise components.
>
> [+0] meh, I don't care
>
> [-1] Nope, stop I need the Geronimo Server and I will ACTIVELY help to
> maintain and evolve it in the future!
>
>
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> > Am 11.05.2017 um 22:09 schrieb Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>:
> >
> > There should be a public vote.
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 9:13 PM, Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I think we came to an agreement so far
> >
> >
> > Le mar. 25 avr. 2017 à 00:21, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> a écrit
> :
> > Or do we need another formal vote?
> >
> > If we are all on the same boat, when, how and who is drafting the
> Announcement?
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> >
>
>

Mime
View raw message