Return-Path: X-Original-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Delivered-To: archive-asf-public-internal@cust-asf2.ponee.io Received: from cust-asf.ponee.io (cust-asf.ponee.io [163.172.22.183]) by cust-asf2.ponee.io (Postfix) with ESMTP id 01AFA200B96 for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:11:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) id 002BE160AE0; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 12:11:09 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: archive-asf-public@cust-asf.ponee.io Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by cust-asf.ponee.io (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DA0E160AAD for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 14:11:07 +0200 (CEST) Received: (qmail 67801 invoked by uid 500); 6 Oct 2016 12:11:07 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 67791 invoked by uid 99); 6 Oct 2016 12:11:07 -0000 Received: from mail-relay.apache.org (HELO mail-relay.apache.org) (140.211.11.15) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:11:07 +0000 Received: from mail-yw0-f174.google.com (mail-yw0-f174.google.com [209.85.161.174]) by mail-relay.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mail-relay.apache.org) with ESMTPSA id B50141A015B for ; Thu, 6 Oct 2016 12:11:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yw0-f174.google.com with SMTP id g192so11500237ywh.1 for ; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 05:11:06 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: AA6/9Rmzrt9TjLOvx+jYW+mkhKYb6U2WQUKsDwutFtgCzKgV6h2XTIbA0H/e82BFJ5UKKH5t+f2oGMTyXkK1BQ== X-Received: by 10.13.208.4 with SMTP id s4mr9938143ywd.338.1475755865737; Thu, 06 Oct 2016 05:11:05 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: "John D. Ament" Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:10:55 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release geronimo-validation 1.0 spec API To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a114e5506271206053e313099 archived-at: Thu, 06 Oct 2016 12:11:09 -0000 --001a114e5506271206053e313099 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I'd recommend making the following changes in the release: - DEPENDENCIES file is not necessary, if its easy to remove kill it. - NOTICE file is not up to date, references JSR-303 instead of 349 and copyright 2014 instead of 2016. - Specification-Version in the pom uses "1.0" but I would expect "1.1" (maybe?) John On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM John D. Ament wrote: > The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0". I'm assuming this is in > fact the 1.1 release? > > John > > On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > > Hi guys, > > I'd like to release a 1.0 of our validation jar. > > After having checked with gunnar the jar and removed the @Deprecated we > had our jar should be fine (see > https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidation.org/issues/35#issuecomment-251938455 > for the conversation on that) so I staged a 1.0 (yeah!). > > Here is the staging repo: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1026/ > > And the source jar is at: > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-1026/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-validation_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-validation_1.1_spec-1.0-source-release.zip > > > > My key can be found at > *https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS > * > > please VOTE > [+1] all fine > [+0] don't care > [-1] stop, because ${good.reason} > > here is my +1 > > Thanks, > Romain Manni-Bucau > @rmannibucau | Blog > | Old Wordpress Blog > | Github > | LinkedIn > | Tomitriber > | JavaEE Factory > > > --001a114e5506271206053e313099 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'd recommend making the following changes in the rele= ase:

- DEPENDENCIES file is not necessary, if its easy t= o remove kill it.
- NOTICE file is not up to date, references JSR= -303 instead of 349 and copyright 2014 instead of 2016.
- Specifi= cation-Version in the pom uses "1.0" but I would expect "1.1= " (maybe?)

John

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 8:06 AM John D. Ament &= lt;johndament@apache.org> w= rote:
The release says "1.1" but the email says "1.0"= .=C2=A0 I'm assuming this is in fact the 1.1 release?

<= /div>
John

On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 7:55 AM Romain Manni-= Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
<= /div>
Hi guys,

I'd like to release a 1.0 of our validation jar.

After having checked with gunnar the jar and removed the @Deprecat= ed we had our jar should be fine (see=C2=A0https://github.com/beanvalidation/beanvalidati= on.org/issues/35#issuecomment-251938455 for the conversation on that) s= o I staged a 1.0 (yeah!).

Here is the staging repo:=C2=A0https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/org= apachegeronimo-1026/

And the source jar is at:=C2=A0https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-102= 6/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-validation_1.1_spec/1.0/geronimo-valid= ation_1.1_spec-1.0-source-release.zip



My key can be f= ound at
https://dis= t.apache.org/repos/dist/release/tomee/KEYS

plea= se=C2=A0VOTE
[+1] all fine
[+0] don't c= are
[-1] stop, because ${good.reason}

here is my +1

Thanks,
Romain Manni-Bucau
@rma= nnibucau | =C2=A0Blog=C2=A0| Old Wordpress Blog= |=C2=A0Github=C2=A0| LinkedIn=C2=A0| Tomi= triber=C2=A0| JavaEE Factory
=
--001a114e5506271206053e313099--