geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: PR Merge?
Date Tue, 23 Aug 2016 16:49:48 GMT
No it's not _that_ easy. Simply using a WeakHashMap wont work. You also have to wrap the value
in a WeakReference. Otherwise the value in the Map will prevent the CL from being garbage
collected. A common pitfall I've seen soooo often implemented the wrong way ;)

LieGrue,
strub




> On Tuesday, 23 August 2016, 17:42, Clebert Suconic <clebert.suconic@gmail.com>
wrote:
> >>  Not sure I get you there, commons clearly doesn't take in charge any of 
> that
>>  but some containers can force some cleanup (not the other way around) - at
>>  least for beansutils for instance.
> 
> With a WeakHashmap, the cache will be removed once the classLoader is
> released, right? Which is what I am trying to achieve here. The cache
> per classLoader. And Removing the classLoader once the references are
> 
> released.
> 
> 
>> 
>>  Starting with a "leaking" WeakHashMap<ClassLoader, 
> Provider> and see if
>>  consumers are complaining.
>> 
>>  It would solve your issue and I can make it working in tomee for instance
> 
> 
> Why it would matter? a WeakHashMap won't cause a leak in anyways. The
> ClassLoader is a weak references. Whenever Tomee released the
> classLoader the element would go away from the WeakHashMap. That's how
> weakHashMaps work, and that's the intent.
> 

Mime
View raw message