Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EA82C1878C for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:35:23 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 41382 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2016 09:35:23 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41319 invoked by uid 500); 27 Mar 2016 09:35:23 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 41120 invoked by uid 99); 27 Mar 2016 09:35:22 -0000 Received: from pnap-us-west-generic-nat.apache.org (HELO spamd3-us-west.apache.org) (209.188.14.142) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:35:22 +0000 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by spamd3-us-west.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at spamd3-us-west.apache.org) with ESMTP id 68DF418021C for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:35:22 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavisd-new at spamd3-us-west.apache.org X-Spam-Flag: NO X-Spam-Score: 1.179 X-Spam-Level: * X-Spam-Status: No, score=1.179 tagged_above=-999 required=6.31 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=2, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=disabled Authentication-Results: spamd3-us-west.apache.org (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com Received: from mx2-lw-us.apache.org ([10.40.0.8]) by localhost (spamd3-us-west.apache.org [10.40.0.10]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NX0SxG9pLv7Q for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:35:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-lf0-f67.google.com (mail-lf0-f67.google.com [209.85.215.67]) by mx2-lw-us.apache.org (ASF Mail Server at mx2-lw-us.apache.org) with ESMTPS id 7AAEE5F3F0 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 09:35:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-lf0-f67.google.com with SMTP id i75so8906029lfb.1 for ; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 02:35:20 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc; bh=K5aoyPqG8CE+mHN6pAnR1K49qQgF3vuHewLZbq2TnUc=; b=jr3kTnjqpJuc9HHzV8uAsyvhZlaJltVjQfGmTBA6KkwQmKG0GFGGYJe12wTLTHnlvT PX1sQD/le7Da59CzYifvS4530cZsoA2qh8hEMkWK396ANFlDmMm0PY9ESS0uysjUxG8X hRW6XSq1JFySSjxNRXkUcNnsGQ+as25ieLUoUT1PYqdg2PE9iFd6hxwlBXIXJsGzz6kQ WFSCU9lnwem5nQnppduPsePG+uKUKpXNpiaqiPPKMlY0sPEVF1mm3yRxhmfQFiCRpX20 WQa5fDuVM6KP+DCTVGwHby+QTngedwugY9SHPOjEAnnAUsV9/uYRwPK78Lgg0JsOokJ8 8U7A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc; bh=K5aoyPqG8CE+mHN6pAnR1K49qQgF3vuHewLZbq2TnUc=; b=BL2oikZfsJnsYLIB54lwYmy1bj2bgRZClx3lQZzqkwK0fC/TaXDecFu10nC16LpZvd 9SbZkdK8l0XUy6h4ZI/nfqJm6kS1D3byONX2F94ItY5eZY6edaGoYi74lulicJ5olJJJ a3J1x90/klRNYkMcochNdvR7Af8frkcFCMQHrVGza58GSsc3lj4JA7a1+mqVy7LMlRXV zAUj4ebv6548UhJdXUY2btVgzO8FBRVGrW5iJyVYd5/8qWhjubUM3geA4rNZ+z6G12m/ 9T0Uixqd9m6LaR9Q3Ha+87CNbmJyJ6mS44Uy6DnbhqckiYgM1sB3J6UjKPYfE55igRUx Gflg== X-Gm-Message-State: AD7BkJImRHVDRZxp0u44QPrhFspRUpHLEWu0VxGFhBakHVQfWhQiBBxPOeiaHcu+woFou+Nda7fM3TylV6JKhw== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.25.209.83 with SMTP id i80mr8872962lfg.74.1459071318826; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.161.207 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.25.161.207 with HTTP; Sun, 27 Mar 2016 02:35:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Sun, 27 Mar 2016 11:35:18 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: JCache dependency From: Romain Manni-Bucau To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Cc: dev@ignite.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fbc46a9261b052f048351 --001a113fbc46a9261b052f048351 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Alpha cause asf doesnt have oracle tck so we cant validate binary compat but it targets jcache 1.0. More a legal thing than anything else. If you have access to tck and can validate the binaries we can move on 1.0 Le 27 mars 2016 00:21, "Dmitriy Setrakyan" a =C3=A9= crit : > Hi Romain, > > The only issue I see is the version. JSR107 spec is on version 1.0.0 [1], > while the Geronimo JCache jar is on version 1.0-alpha-1. > > Any chance you can upgrade the version? > > [1] https://github.com/jsr107/jsr107spec/tree/v1.0.0 > > D. > > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau > wrote: > >> Hi Dmitriy, >> >> why not reusing geronimo jar? Generally @apache spec are owned by >> geronimo and reused as much as possible using geronimo as umbrella >> spec project. What's the issue you hit? >> >> Romain Manni-Bucau >> @rmannibucau | Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber >> >> >> 2016-03-26 21:20 GMT+01:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan : >> > Sorry, this is the JCache maven dependency I was referring to: >> > >> http://mvnrepository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jca= che_1.0_spec >> > >> > >> > On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan < >> dsetrakyan@apache.org> >> > wrote: >> >> >> >> Hello Geronimo community! >> >> >> >> I have noticed that Geronimo implements JCache spec and is using its >> own >> >> JCache library hosted in Apache maven and licensed under Apache 2.0 >> license >> >> [1]. >> >> >> >> We, in Apache Ignite community also have implemented JCache >> specification >> >> and would like to do something similar. Do you know what steps do we >> need to >> >> take in order to have the latest JCache spec version licensed under >> Apache >> >> 2.0? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Dmitriy Setrakyan >> >> Apache Ignite, PMC chair >> > >> > >> > > --001a113fbc46a9261b052f048351 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Alpha cause asf doesnt have oracle tck so we cant validate b= inary compat but it targets jcache 1.0. More a legal thing than anything el= se. If you have access to tck and can validate the binaries we can move on = 1.0

Le=C2=A027 mars 2016 00:21, "Dmitriy Setrak= yan" <dsetrakyan@apache.or= g> a =C3=A9crit=C2=A0:
Hi Romain,

The only issue I s= ee is the version. JSR107 spec is on version 1.0.0 [1], while the Geronimo = JCache jar is on version 1.0-alpha-1.

Any chance y= ou can upgrade the version?


D.

On Sat, M= ar 26, 2016 at 1:36 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com&= gt; wrote:
Hi Dmitriy,

why not reusing geronimo jar? Generally @apache spec are owned by
geronimo and reused as much as possible using geronimo as umbrella
spec project. What's the issue you hit?

Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau |=C2=A0 Blog | Github | LinkedIn | Tomitriber


2016-03-26 21:20 GMT+01:00 Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org>:
> Sorry, this is the JCache maven dependency I was referring to:
> http://mvnr= epository.com/artifact/org.apache.geronimo.specs/geronimo-jcache_1.0_spec
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 26, 2016 at 1:18 PM, Dmitriy Setrakyan <dsetrakyan@apache.org> > wrote:
>>
>> Hello Geronimo community!
>>
>> I have noticed that Geronimo implements JCache spec and is using i= ts own
>> JCache library hosted in Apache maven and licensed under Apache 2.= 0 license
>> [1].
>>
>> We, in Apache Ignite community also have implemented JCache specif= ication
>> and would like to do something similar. Do you know what steps do = we need to
>> take in order to have the latest JCache spec version licensed unde= r Apache
>> 2.0?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Dmitriy Setrakyan
>> Apache Ignite, PMC chair
>
>

--001a113fbc46a9261b052f048351--