Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: error (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2070.6\))
Subject: Re: Board report time 2015-04
From: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
In-Reply-To: <97FC9A1D-5BE9-4BA8-A7AA-C1068552FB86@toolazydogs.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2015 09:25:54 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <5C2E1AF8-83D8-4CA3-B533-866F61B01F14@yahoo.de>
References: <A4022D55-EE26-4678-859C-808E01474590@toolazydogs.com>
 <9F12AD9D-547C-4934-9E6B-E146169A4E3C@yahoo.de>
 <97FC9A1D-5BE9-4BA8-A7AA-C1068552FB86@toolazydogs.com>
To: geronimo-dev <dev@geronimo.apache.org>

It=E2=80=99s not only the spec-api stuff.
There are also many other things like xbean, geronimo-jta, javamail, =
etc. It=E2=80=99s basically a commons-EE atm.

If you talk about a reboot then I wonder what you had in mind. There is =
TomEE which takes the really lightweight approach. And having two =
implementations providing the same doesn=E2=80=99t make sense. At least =
not if there are exactly the same people involved=E2=80=A6
Should the Geronimo-Server focus on OSGi? That is what made the big =
difference so far. No clue otherwise.

LieGrue,
strub


> Am 07.04.2015 um 08:10 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com>:
>=20
> I agree, we should start moving our focus.
>=20
> When you speak of #2, what bits do you speak of?  The glue that =
assembles the various JSR implementations of the JEE spec?
>=20
> I wonder if we should start a total re-write.  We=E2=80=99ve learned a =
thing or two since this project started and the current Zeitgeist for =
server software has moved on.
>=20
> I think it=E2=80=99s an exciting time to take a fresh look at Geronimo =
and to =E2=80=9Cre-imagine=E2=80=9D it.  If you all agree, what to keep =
and what to re-write?=20
>=20
>=20
> Regards,
> Alan
>=20
>> On Apr 6, 2015, at 7:50 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>=20
>> Txs Alan!
>>=20
>>=20
>> I think we should probably move our focus finally? The Geronimo =
project basically consists of 2 different things.
>> 1.) the Geronimo EE server
>> 2.) all the rest ;)
>>=20
>> 2 is doing really fine. 1 is worrying. Or are there any significant =
people interested in continueing with 1?
>>=20
>> Should we reflect this in the report?
>>=20
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>=20
>>=20
>>=20
>>> Am 04.04.2015 um 20:36 schrieb Alan D. Cabrera =
<list@toolazydogs.com>:
>>>=20
>>> Here's my initial draft:
>>>=20
>>> =
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Apache+Geronimo+Board=
+Report+-+2015-04+-+April
>>>=20
>>> If I missed something please let me know or go ahead and update the =
page directly.
>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>=20
>>=20
>=20