geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: State of JAX-RS 2.0 spec
Date Tue, 24 Mar 2015 14:24:17 GMT
Hi

bundle manifest is surely not correct - think nobody tested it in osgi yet
but for other use cases it should be fine. Sources were written @apache
(and just compared to the spec, not copied from the spec) so we shouldnt
need to add the RI in the notice AFAIK.


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau> |  Blog
<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com> | Github <https://github.com/rmannibucau> |
LinkedIn <https://www.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau> | Tomitriber
<http://www.tomitribe.com>

2015-03-24 13:18 GMT+01:00 Bernd <ecki@zusammenkunft.net>:

> Hello,
>
> I noticed that the JAX-RS Spec Pom is not listed on the Maven site (
> http://geronimo.apache.org/maven/specs/index.html under "Modules"). When
> I look into the source repository I see in the POM that it puts "1.1" in
> the Bundle manifest and OSGi exports. So I wonder if this project is
> already "production ready" or abandoned.
>
> Another question, the NOTICE file does not mention anything about the
> source of the code. Is it typically decided that there is no need to
> mention the license of the spec PDFs or the RI files?
>
> Gruss
> Bernd
>

Mime
View raw message