geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSS] Make a new geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release
Date Wed, 04 Feb 2015 11:53:28 GMT
for javamail we need both


Romain Manni-Bucau
@rmannibucau
http://www.tomitribe.com
http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
https://github.com/rmannibucau


2015-02-04 12:51 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <hendrikdev22@gmail.com>:
> do we plan to release javamail alpha specs only or specs and impl? i
> ll vote for both
>
> On Wed, Dec 3, 2014 at 2:29 PM, Romain Manni-Bucau
> <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
>> 1.8.0 sounds good. If anyone with a setup to run TCKs can do it it
>> would be awesome otherwise we can do a 1.8.0-alpha-1 without this
>> check.
>>
>>
>> Romain Manni-Bucau
>> @rmannibucau
>> http://www.tomitribe.com
>> http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com
>> https://github.com/rmannibucau
>>
>>
>> 2014-12-03 13:59 GMT+01:00 Hendrik Dev <hendrikdev22@gmail.com>:
>>> Hi Devs,
>>>
>>> last geronimo javamail 1.4 spec release (1.7.1) was back in 2010.
>>> Since then the following issues were fixed:
>>>
>>> GERONIMO-5842
>>> GERONIMO-6165
>>> GERONIMO-6438
>>> GERONIMO-6471
>>> GERONIMO-6480
>>> GERONIMO-6530
>>> + some NOTICE/legal stuff
>>>
>>> I'd like to propose to make a new release (1.7.2 or maybe 1.8.0 ?)
>>> because of the above mentioned fixes and the fact that this is
>>> prerequisite to make a new javamail 1.4 provider impl release (which
>>> will fix a lot of longstanding bugs).
>>>
>>> I volunteer to drive this but i need some help because geronimo
>>> release/QA process is new to me.
>>> Maybe its also necessary/useful to run the TCKs to which i had no access (yet).
>>>
>>> Opinions?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> Hendrik
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
>>> @hendrikdev22
>>> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC
>
>
>
> --
> Hendrik Saly (salyh, hendrikdev22)
> @hendrikdev22
> PGP: 0x22D7F6EC

Mime
View raw message