geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISUCSS] release alpha-1 versions of a few EE7 artifacts?
Date Thu, 28 Aug 2014 06:34:45 GMT
+1


Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau


2014-08-28 8:19 GMT+02:00 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>:
> I am not quite sure about that. Would need to dig all the download links and
> the spec papers.
> Imo it doesn't hurt to have -alpha-1.
> That way we also have a chance to finally work on the javadoc side of our
> artifacts. This is a huge disaster area atm...
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> On Wednesday, 27 August 2014, 3:37, Daniel Kulp <dkulp@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> We currently do not have any current license agreement or other
> document/contract placing any such restriction on version numbers or
> releases.   Feel free to release them as whatever version number you want or
> feel is appropriate.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On Aug 26, 2014, at 6:22 AM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> The JavaEE license allows to release preliminary versions of spec artifacts
> as long as they are appropriately marked.
> We need those in a public repo to continue our work on OpenWebBeans-2.x,
> BVal-1.1.x and TomEE-2.x.
> And of course probably Geronimo4 ;)
>
> I've now identified the following candidates:
>
> * geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec
> * geronimo-jcdi_1.1_spec
> * geronimo-interceptor_1.2_spec
> * geronimo-concurrent_1.0_spec
>
>
> what postfix shall I take?
> -RC-1
> -alpha-1
> ?
>
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --
> Daniel Kulp
> dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
> Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
>
>
>

Mime
View raw message