Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4168310738 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:40:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 95880 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2013 14:40:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94956 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2013 14:40:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 94900 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2013 14:40:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:40:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kwsutter@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.47 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.47] (HELO mail-la0-f47.google.com) (209.85.215.47) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 14:40:03 +0000 Received: by mail-la0-f47.google.com with SMTP id ep20so4250143lab.6 for ; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:39:43 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=dDxiccAQEWUNtcv37pYzmEgWA1nrzD6pMbp4yAuB8IY=; b=u1xCquJDpdVG4FkpOiooqSeMA9R2ww+UGE03rJEatToURgYRxBzfhuqneCUNJZizVp YKGs+4QHPJ4tivf8b4Cru1rU6NmThHiqeX3PCIYDiaVpZmzLcIIh9eyRG66JM5JGrCH/ umgktjEOW8eYBq5HdSPiMUE3/CNxVBfgi3y/m2RjSLWYdtUnu8HeL2p4ZLGVvmiw5K02 F+DVK2PD7NKxOyiKrWrS3aQOAmyaCqNa8aSYjgbEgibuhkFooI+dY+DSGFioI9sOUgke 3DmGwv7tLJ+lTzPJLcxVBnuMyfPOCExZ3v9s5ABdXoVXNvo181IQVmC6h4gG5lDQbFXD 248w== X-Received: by 10.152.234.37 with SMTP id ub5mr23203lac.51.1385476783224; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:39:43 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.112.217.102 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Nov 2013 06:39:23 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <1385394823.79603.YahooMailNeo@web28903.mail.ir2.yahoo.com> From: Kevin Sutter Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2013 08:39:23 -0600 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release geronimo-jbatch_1.0-1.0 To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134609c823de404ec157348 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --001a1134609c823de404ec157348 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi Romain, That's interesting when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires Java SE 7... But, maybe since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment, they can change their requirement for SE. But, technically, they can't override the requirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment. It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual requirement will cause any issues for the implementation and integration with Java EE environments. I guess we'll find out... Kevin On Tue, Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau wrote: > Hi Mark, > > "the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec says > > "This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It > requires Java 6 or higher. " > > Not sure it is a blocker or not. > Romain Manni-Bucau > Twitter: @rmannibucau > Blog: http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/ > LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau > Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau > > > > 2013/11/25 Mark Struberg : > > Good evening! > > > > I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API. > > > > The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatch > TCK. > > > > The staging repo is > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/ > > > > The source release is here > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-release.zip > > > > The tag can be found here > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/ > > > > [+1] ship it > > [+0] meh, don't care > > [-1] nope, because ${reason} > > > > Here is my +1 > > > > LieGrue, > > strub > > > > > --001a1134609c823de404ec157348 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi Romain,
That's interesting = when the Java EE 7 spec is clear that it requires Java SE 7...=A0 But, mayb= e since Java Batch can also be used in an SE environment, they can change t= heir requirement for SE.=A0 But, technically, they can't override the r= equirement for Java SE 7 in the EE environment.

It may not be a big deal for the API, but I wonder if this dual r= equirement will cause any issues for the implementation and integration wit= h Java EE environments.=A0 I guess we'll find out...

Kevin=


On Tue,= Nov 26, 2013 at 4:01 AM, Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Mark,

"the only issue I found is you built it against java 7 where the spec = says

"This specification applies to Java SE and Java EE environments. It requires Java 6 or higher. "

Not sure it is a blocker or not.
Romain Manni-Bucau
Twitter: @rmannibucau
Blog: http:= //rmannibucau.wordpress.com/
LinkedIn: http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau
Github: https:= //github.com/rmannibucau



2013/11/25 Mark Struberg <struberg@= yahoo.de>:
> Good evening!
>
> I'd like to call a VOTE on releasing the geronimo jbatch 1.0 API.<= br> >
> The API is already used in Apache BatchEE and passes the JSR-352 JBatc= h TCK.
>
> The staging repo is
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep= ositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/
>
> The source release is here
> https://reposi= tory.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-005/org/apache/geron= imo/specs/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec/1.0/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0-source-= release.zip
>
> The tag can be found here
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf= /geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-jbatch_1.0_spec-1.0/
>
> [+1] ship it
> [+0] meh, don't care
> [-1] nope, because ${reason}
>
> Here is my +1
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>

--001a1134609c823de404ec157348--