Agree Jarek's point, it's better to roll out a quick release with some important fixes that users want.--On Thu, May 9, 2013 at 2:02 PM, Jarek Gawor <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
Yes, current set of dependencies. I'm worried that once we start
upgrading the versions of the various dependencies it will take weeks
or months to resolve the problems caused by the upgrade. So for now I
would rather focus on getting something out especially since things
appear to be in a decent shape. Of course, if there is something that
can be upgraded and it doesn't cause a lot of problems or additional
work - I'm all for it.
On Wed, May 8, 2013 at 3:25 PM, Kevan Miller <email@example.com> wrote:
> On May 8, 2013, at 3:00 PM, Jarek Gawor <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> I think it's probably a good time to have a new Geronimo 3 release
>> (3.0.1?). We've fixed a bunch of stuff, upgraded Tomcat, OpenJPA, and
>> fixed Java 7 complication issues. TCK is also looking pretty good now.
> Sounds great to me. I assume this is with the current set of dependencies? E.g. OpenEJB 4.0.0-beta-1, xbean 3.11.1, myfaces 2.1.11, etc…
> Would be good to run a similar email by the user list…