geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is there a need to release GEP 3.0.1 for Geronimo 3.0.1?
Date Tue, 28 May 2013 01:25:00 GMT
I port changes on trunk back to eclipse-plugin 3.0 branch for 3.0.1
release, and let's use 3.0 branch for future GEP 3.0.x work.


On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 2:31 AM, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm not entirely sure. Things just got mixed up I guess. I was
> actually thinking about moving sever/3.0 branch into trunk and moving
> existing server/trunk into some experimental branch.
>
> Jarek
>
> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:48 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Just curious, Is there any reason made changes to trunk, but not 3.0
> > branches of GEP?
> >
> > I thought we should follow this convention: GEP trunk supports server
> trunk,
> > GEP 3.0 branch supports server 3.0. branch.
> >
> >
> > On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 11:28 PM, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> I think you used a wrong branch to compare. The latest updates went
> >> into devtools/eclipse-plugin/trunk and not
> >> devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/3.0. There was a definitely lots of
> >> changes since 3.0.0 so yes I would vote to release it.
> >>
> >> Jarek
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 24, 2013 at 2:01 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> > Hi all,
> >> >
> >> > I checked GEP 3.0 branch revision history, but not found any new code
> >> > fixes
> >> > after its 3.0.0 release back to July of 2012, so my question is, is
> >> > there a
> >> > need to make a new GEP release for 3.0.1 server?
> >> >
> >> > I did some simple testing, the current GEP 3.0.0 release works well
> with
> >> > 3.0.1 server.
> >> >
> >> > --
> >> > Thanks!
> >> >
> >> > Regards, Forrest
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Regards, Forrest
>



-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Mime
View raw message