geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: asm4 in xbean
Date Mon, 27 May 2013 07:42:42 GMT
Mainly a real complete support of Java 7 IMO

*Romain Manni-Bucau*
*Twitter: @rmannibucau <https://twitter.com/rmannibucau>*
*Blog: **http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/*<http://rmannibucau.wordpress.com/>
*LinkedIn: **http://fr.linkedin.com/in/rmannibucau*
*Github: https://github.com/rmannibucau*



2013/5/27 Jean-Louis MONTEIRO <jeanouii@gmail.com>

> Out of curiosity, what are the objectives of such a change?
> I mean, is there any important improvments on ASM4 we cannot miss?
> Is ASM 3 end of life?
>
> Jean-Louis
>
>
>
> 2013/5/27 Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> A small discussion which popped up on IRC regarding asm4:
>>
>> Preclusion: ASM3 and ASM4 are _not_ binary compatible but use the same
>> packages.
>> For preventing some classpath clashes this xbean-asm-shaded package got
>> created. This was ASM3 so far.
>>
>> When moving up to ASM4 we should thus change the package we shade it in,
>> e.g. to org.apache.xbean.asm4.*
>> I think there is common agreement on this point, right?
>>
>> I've added a new module of xbean-asm4-shaded which uses ASM4 and shades
>> to the aforementioned path.
>> But what to do with the asm3 shade?
>>
>> We now have two options:
>> Do we like to
>>
>> 1.) keep both
>>
>>
>> or do we like to
>>
>>
>> 2.) upgrade whole xbean to ASM4 and remove the old xbean-asm-shaded (and
>> only keep xbean-asm4-shaded)?
>>
>> 2.b) keep the xbean-asm-shaded artifactId but otherwise do like 2.). I
>> perso don't like this much as it is not so explicit for users.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Jean-Louis
>

Mime
View raw message