geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Mark Struberg <strub...@yahoo.de>
Subject Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
Date Sat, 20 Apr 2013 06:19:33 GMT
thats a legal thingy with the JCP rules.

We must not release this as 'final' version if the spec is only a MR. Thus the next best we
can do is to add the MR2 to the version.

LieGrue,
strub




>________________________________
> From: Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibucau@gmail.com>
>To: Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>; dev@geronimo.apache.org 
>Sent: Friday, 19 April 2013, 22:10
>Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
> 
>
>
>No app/lib will ise mr2 IMO so i'd remove it
>Le 19 avr. 2013 20:09, "Mark Struberg" <struberg@yahoo.de> a écrit :
>
>folks, what is the correct bundle version for a MR2 release?
>>
>>
>> <Export-Package>javax.annotation*;version=1.2.MR2</Export-Package>
>>
>>is this ok from an OSGi perspective? Or should we ditch the 'MR2' anyway and just
keep it in the version for now?
>>
>>
>>
>>LieGrue,
>>strub
>>
>>
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>> From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>>> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org; Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de>
>>> Cc:
>>> Sent: Tuesday, 16 April 2013, 21:40
>>> Subject: Re: commons-annotation-1.2.MR2
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 16, 2013, at 3:32 PM, Mark Struberg <struberg@yahoo.de> wrote:
>>>
>>>>  hi folks!
>>>>
>>>>  In CDI and EJB for EE7 we need a few things from
>>> commons-annotation-1.2.MR2.
>>>>  Most important is the new javax.annotation.Priority annotation.
>>>>
>>>>  Should I just svn copy the geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec module and add
the
>>> missing annotations?
>>>
>>> Hi Mark,
>>> Are you proposing that we svn copy geronimo-annotation_1.1_spec to a new
>>> geronimo-annotation_1.2_spec and start adding new features defined by the new
>>> spec?
>>>
>>> If so, then yes. Sounds good to me. Thanks!
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>>
>>
>
>

Mime
View raw message