Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 19E0A9348 for ; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:50:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 49342 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 01:50:17 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 49108 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2012 01:50:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 49090 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2012 01:50:16 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:50:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=5.0 tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of genspring@gmail.com designates 209.85.217.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.217.182] (HELO mail-lb0-f182.google.com) (209.85.217.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 28 Jun 2012 01:50:09 +0000 Received: by lbon10 with SMTP id n10so2971849lbo.13 for ; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:49:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=ahUVnIsYQeLyM7NAkpOA7gZ4A6j09VdJ8Bk4OUYphCM=; b=GweDbqmWtK+WMUsX0ZC3K7JNR3BZZSiVsjIHBGPKwpNfhlmJ8Sl9l6YDxziSP45uAe DvUd5mnYCMPqZM2O1kJrFM4kcbbUOtfGi7qVGRtEaBwuYhbHKYPlCXrpYxy59xH/vN6C t5BcCbswMK9iIeHCfC/83fatiYDna5bY/EH5kfpt5g6WLIWEmvAvOLLpDO2kPhrgbKz+ MREzQOjQClGl0gyKPfOYKZ67G5e50maQCYbPzFejoADuujMF0LsxzzdodOUeHErblLWx esxQM1x789qJFtXyWlmRR13ul6u+m0jEeCMJPeM57vAdAU2C1O2J7v3HBZyGd9wWMv1y vhQA== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.104.77 with SMTP id gc13mr25518lab.31.1340848189145; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.28.105 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Jun 2012 18:49:49 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2012 09:49:49 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: [discussion]Time to release to Geronimo 2.2.2 ? From: Shawn Jiang To: dev@geronimo.apache.org, user@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04083adb03028e04c37e8c9d --f46d04083adb03028e04c37e8c9d Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 We had some discussion with a user request [1], The initial thought from me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the recent openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes. But it seems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb is in a good shape. In this period, we at least can clean other things for G2.2.2, I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else we might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2. [1] http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Request-for-Geronimo-2-2-2-Release-td3985045.html -- Shawn --f46d04083adb03028e04c37e8c9d Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
We had some discussion with a user request [1],=A0The initial thought = from me is to include the security patches since G2.2.1 and pull in the rec= ent openejb 3.1.5 clustering changes.=A0

But it se= ems openejb 3.1.5 is not ready now, we have to hold until openejb is in a g= ood shape. =A0 In this period, =A0we at least can clean other things for G2= .2.2,=A0=A0I'd like to use this thread to hear the voice on what else w= e might want to put into Geronimo 2.2.2.




--
Shawn
--f46d04083adb03028e04c37e8c9d--