geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review status of G 3.0.0 release goals
Date Mon, 25 Jun 2012 04:41:43 GMT
+1 to drop Jetty release from 3.0.0 release for now.

On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:04 PM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com> wrote:

> Echo Jarek's response here in dev list again:
>
> So it looks like we have quite a bit of failures on Jetty. I guess we
> either have to drop it from the release (if we want to release soon)
> or try to fix it and delay the release. Thoughts?
>
> My thought is to drop jetty release for 3.0.0 and roll out tomcat assembly
> asap. Any more thoughts about 3.0.0 release??
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 23, 2012 at 12:57 AM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jun 22, 2012, at 9:20 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2012 at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 9:47 AM, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > How are things with Jetty? Some user emails gave me an impression that
>>> > things don't look too good. If things with Jetty are looking bad then
>>> > we should either consider dropping it from the release or delaying the
>>> > release until we get it in shape.
>>> > Some status consolidation here about Jetty assembly in 3.0 branch:
>>> > 1. BV and DI tck all pass for jetty8-javaee6 assembly
>>> > 2. JCDI and full profile execution just triggered, we will see some
>>> results after two days.
>>> > JCDI tck against jetty8-javaee6 failed most of the cases.
>>> > Jetty assembly results:
>>> > Tests 37068
>>> > Passed        23616
>>> > Failed        13452
>>>
>>> Forrest -- too much TCK information on a public list. TCK terms may be
>>> improving in the future. However, until then, we should not talk about test
>>> names, numbers of tests, etc.
>>>
>> OK, got it, sorry for that.
>>
>>>
>>> --kevan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards, Forrest
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
>
>


-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message