geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Review status of G 3.0.0 release goals
Date Tue, 26 Jun 2012 14:17:28 GMT
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>wrote:

>
> On Jun 25, 2012, at 12:04 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> > Echo Jarek's response here in dev list again:
> >
> > So it looks like we have quite a bit of failures on Jetty. I guess we
> > either have to drop it from the release (if we want to release soon)
> > or try to fix it and delay the release. Thoughts?
> >
> > My thought is to drop jetty release for 3.0.0 and roll out tomcat
> assembly asap. Any more thoughts about 3.0.0 release??
>
> We certainly can't record jetty as a certified release. Nor does there
> appear to be sufficient energy in the community to certify in the near
> future.
>
> Can you be a bit more explicit in what you're proposing?
>
> For beta-1, Jetty was released and marked as a non-certified release.
>
> Are you proposing to:
>
> 1) release tomcat/jetty source and binaries, but mark jetty binaries as
> non-certified,
> 2) remove jetty from the build, but keep in source tree and only release
> tomcat binaries
>
#2 would be what I want to proceed

> 3) remove jetty from the source tree, and only release tomcat-based source
> and binaries
>
> --kevan




-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Mime
View raw message