Return-Path: 
 <dev-return-94995-apmail-geronimo-dev-archive=geronimo.apache.org@geronimo.apache.org>
X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org
Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3])
	by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 31DB9C0BA
	for <apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org>;
 Wed,  9 May 2012 03:01:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: (qmail 87434 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2012 03:01:24 -0000
Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87205 invoked by uid 500); 9 May 2012 03:01:23 -0000
Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
list-help: <mailto:dev-help@geronimo.apache.org>
list-unsubscribe: <mailto:dev-unsubscribe@geronimo.apache.org>
List-Post: <mailto:dev@geronimo.apache.org>
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
List-Id: <dev.geronimo.apache.org>
Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received: (qmail 87135 invoked by uid 99); 9 May 2012 03:01:22 -0000
Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 03:01:21 +0000
X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0
	tests=HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS
X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of forrestxm@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender)
Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-wg0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50)
    by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 09 May 2012 03:01:16 +0000
Received: by wgbds11 with SMTP id ds11so3255417wgb.31
        for <dev@geronimo.apache.org>; Tue, 08 May 2012 20:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        bh=Xv0H6q+UwnF7ojCJfXaYU6hTQcVlBFbTtQdXvFSCksY=;
        b=B+i6rE85mx4Fizu9bhR2e80MMs3vsNffqUw7zbBe9yg+tNapn+i/n7SZT09Y141xwd
         nbr6/7+t8E8F8VTc3wD8KKV1VXcLnvwNheNT5rijaB8uyKlYex+qiZo8nSEBfd1oTJot
         4LqlxyB9Kce7hORDAE0UyKCvfXUXejafazES7syGgMkfaynFUjJrgiHhua2I4zU+D+7q
         ZufXIDfp2185DTNkyb/RNl/fQuG3JcoZRPBV4SRLUu6BYD5b6Q52jyBGs8sPaNjcWhn+
         uQPtzYl8eXbn46GVuG2hdexclBpnnJMu+CW40i0CbE5x9NiTNVcQAuZ8t0GIL2QrYw6O
         GEww==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.216.137.156 with SMTP id y28mr13475710wei.61.1336532455178;
 Tue, 08 May 2012 20:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.216.17.82 with HTTP; Tue, 8 May 2012 20:00:55 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Tue, 8 May 2012 23:00:55 -0400
Message-ID: 
 <CACR2Osf_vc_QnM+-dqH5a5FUB57RHHjthXgG7pxL1yB6WqSz2g@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Anyone could help look into BV tck issues when upgrading the tck to
 1.0.6.GA?
From: Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00504502cf8038c2f904bf91b6ba
X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org

--00504502cf8038c2f904bf91b6ba
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

I tried the latest BV tck 1.0.6.GA with the latest 3.0-beta branch build,
but hit 19 failures, and I reported to
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6346, is there anyone who
has the best knowledge of Bean Validation integration could help look into
those issues?

The tck logs are attached in the jira there.

-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

--00504502cf8038c2f904bf91b6ba
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

I tried the latest BV tck <a href=3D"http://1.0.6.GA">1.0.6.GA</a> with the=
 latest 3.0-beta branch build, but hit 19 failures, and I reported to <a hr=
ef=3D"https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6346">https://issues.a=
pache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6346</a>, is there anyone who has the best k=
nowledge of Bean Validation integration could help look into those issues?<=
br>
<br>The tck logs are attached in the jira there.<br clear=3D"all"><br>-- <b=
r>Thanks!<br><br>Regards, Forrest<br><br>

--00504502cf8038c2f904bf91b6ba--