Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted sender)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1257)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release bval-jsr303 bundle 0.4_1
From: Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: 
 <CACR2Osffh=1bwVqxGOrCoN6M+vifDkkCt_i2VdESP66a9bvcJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 14 May 2012 09:34:24 -0400
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <A3F4CB7F-F7BB-44F4-A7E7-B090C19D4846@gmail.com>
References: 
 <CACR2Osffh=1bwVqxGOrCoN6M+vifDkkCt_i2VdESP66a9bvcJA@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org

checksum/signature, build, rat, source, license/notice -- all look fine.=20=


Here's my +1, but I have a few comments/questions.

1. velocity.log need not be in svn. best that we remove=85
2. why does geronimo need a bundle release of bval? any reason why our =
requirements have not/cannot be pushed into BVAL?
3. why is there a CDDL license and note in the NOTICE file?

--kevan

On May 14, 2012, at 12:06 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:

> This is a version upgrade release, from 0.3_incubating to 0.4, for =
bval bundled in Geronimo, raised via GERONIMO-6345, it's to fix the tck =
failures when upgrading BV TCK to 1.0.6.GA level.
>=20
> The artifacts up for vote are:
> =
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/o=
rg/apache/geronimo/bundles/bval-jsr303/0.4_1/bval-jsr303-0.4_1-source-rele=
ase.tar.gz
> =
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-086/o=
rg/apache/geronimo/bundles/bval-jsr303/0.4_1/bval-jsr303-0.4_1-source-rele=
ase.zip
>=20
>=20
> The tag is:
> =
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/bundles/tags/bval-jsr303-0.4_1/
>=20
>  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>=20
>  [ ] +1  approve
>  [ ] +0  no opinion
>  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>=20
> --=20
> Thanks!
>=20
> Regards, Forrest
>=20