geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release xbean 3.11
Date Wed, 09 May 2012 23:33:47 GMT
David, I saw a piece in the pom.xml like this:

<plugin>
                <groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
                <artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
                <executions>
                    <execution>
                        <phase>package</phase>
                        <goals>
                            <goal>shade</goal>
                        </goals>
                        <configuration>
                            <relocations>
                                <relocation>
                                    <pattern>org.objectweb.asm</pattern>

<shadedPattern>org.apache.xbean.asm</shadedPattern>
                                </relocation>
                            </relocations>
                            <transformers>
                                <transformer
implementation="org.apache.maven.plugins.shade.resource.ManifestResourceTransformer">
                                    <manifestEntries>
                                        <Bundle-License>
http://asm.ow2.org/license.html</Bundle-License>

<Bundle-SymbolicName>org.apache.xbean.asm-shaded</Bundle-SymbolicName>

<Export-Package>${xbean.osgi.export}</Export-Package>

<Import-Package>${xbean.osgi.export}</Import-Package>
                                    </manifestEntries>
                                </transformer>
                            </transformers>
                        </configuration>
                    </execution>
                </executions>
            </plugin>

Is it enough to claim the license stuffs?

Anyway, thank you for your voting!

On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 11:31 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:

> +1
>
> I doubt the notice in xbean-asm-shaded is correct, but objectweb doesn't
> appear to supply any notice file themselves in asm 3.1 so I find it hard to
> know what would be more correct.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On May 9, 2012, at 5:04 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
> Anyone could help vote this??
>
> On Tue, May 8, 2012 at 9:36 AM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>>
>> On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> This is a minor fix release for these changes:
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1334268 | xiaming | 2012-05-04 20:32:35 -0400 (Fri, 04 May 2012) | 1
>>> line
>>>
>>> Update copyright year to 2012
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1332151 | xuhaihong | 2012-04-30 06:50:33 -0400 (Mon, 30 Apr 2012) | 1
>>> line
>>>
>>> Null checking for bundle location
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1331428 | genspring | 2012-04-27 09:39:19 -0400 (Fri, 27 Apr 2012) | 1
>>> line
>>>
>>> Move reference based bundle utils methods from geornimo kerneal to xbean
>>> bundleutils because we need to call them from BundleResourceHelper.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1326909 | dblevins | 2012-04-17 00:19:11 -0400 (Tue, 17 Apr 2012) | 2
>>> lines
>>>
>>> attach sources all the time
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1326440 | dblevins | 2012-04-15 19:14:37 -0400 (Sun, 15 Apr 2012) | 1
>>> line
>>>
>>> split out link() into more fine grained methods for keener selection of
>>> performance impacts
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1326430 | dblevins | 2012-04-15 17:52:41 -0400 (Sun, 15 Apr 2012) | 1
>>> line
>>>
>>> Ensure getAnnotatedClasses() is always functional.  Simply move the
>>> population of that to the constructor and allow link() to be called more
>>> than once (should have little to no effect).
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1326428 | dblevins | 2012-04-15 17:51:23 -0400 (Sun, 15 Apr 2012) | 3
>>> lines
>>>
>>> XBEAN-206: use jarfile instead of jarinputstream when possible
>>> Iterator changes based on patch from Romain Manni-Bucau.
>>> Other JarArchive.getBytecode changes in similar vein.
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> r1326261 | dblevins | 2012-04-15 02:52:40 -0400 (Sun, 15 Apr 2012) | 2
>>> lines
>>>
>>> XBEAN-205: JarArchive and Archive API reworked for greater performance
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> *The artifacts up for vote are:*
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.11/xbean-3.11-source-release.tar.gz
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-043/org/apache/xbean/xbean/3.11/xbean-3.11-source-release.zip
>>>
>>> *The tag is:*
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/xbean/tags/xbean-3.11/
>>>
>>>  Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>>  [ ] +1  approve
>>>  [ ] +0  no opinion
>>>  [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards, Forrest
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Shawn
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
>
>
>


-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Mime
View raw message