Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of xhhsld@gmail.com designates
 74.125.83.54 as permitted sender)
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <E4E83161-EB8D-4A4A-AD5C-32D129BF32DC@yahoo.com>
References: 
 <CAPR_grooSp=pieES7xSQ6dFYQGKhVstCgWwZkRpOMpW_vaoZ=g@mail.gmail.com>
	<E4E83161-EB8D-4A4A-AD5C-32D129BF32DC@yahoo.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2012 09:23:23 +0800
Message-ID: 
 <CALS1ypDd0gJc_KV6_L_OaSxfj2kbRy92sPWH+XxR4kQEVUrD7A@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: OSGi 4.3 API
From: Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com>
To: dev@geronimo.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d04182558ed9cb204bc5791b1

--f46d04182558ed9cb204bc5791b1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

agree, with the new wiring api, think we could remove the use of package
admin, and the hook api should be also useful.

2012/3/29 David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>

> I think this is a great idea.... I actually thought the 3.0-beta branch
> was on 4.3, I guess I've been too immersed in trunk.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Mar 28, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm wondering if we should expose OSGi 4.3 API in Geronimo. Currently,
> > in Geronimo 3 we are using Equinox 3.7.1 which already implements OSGi
> > 4.3 API so I think it's just a matter of updating the exports out of
> > the system bundle and updating the OSGi API jars the code is compiled
> > against. OSGi 4.3 has some cool new features such as
> > BundleWiring/FrameworkWiring API that could make some of our code
> > simpler.
> >
> > Thoughts? Concerns?
> >
> > Jarek
>
>


-- 
Ivan

--f46d04182558ed9cb204bc5791b1
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

agree, with the new wiring api, think we could remove the use of package ad=
min, and the hook api should be also useful.<br><br><div class=3D"gmail_quo=
te">2012/3/29 David Jencks <span dir=3D"ltr">&lt;<a href=3D"mailto:david_je=
ncks@yahoo.com">david_jencks@yahoo.com</a>&gt;</span><br>
<blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1p=
x #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">I think this is a great idea.... I actually =
thought the 3.0-beta branch was on 4.3, I guess I&#39;ve been too immersed =
in trunk.<br>

<br>
thanks<br>
<span class=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">david jencks<br>
</font></span><div class=3D"HOEnZb"><div class=3D"h5"><br>
On Mar 28, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Jarek Gawor wrote:<br>
<br>
&gt; Hi,<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; I&#39;m wondering if we should expose OSGi 4.3 API in Geronimo. Curren=
tly,<br>
&gt; in Geronimo 3 we are using Equinox 3.7.1 which already implements OSGi=
<br>
&gt; 4.3 API so I think it&#39;s just a matter of updating the exports out =
of<br>
&gt; the system bundle and updating the OSGi API jars the code is compiled<=
br>
&gt; against. OSGi 4.3 has some cool new features such as<br>
&gt; BundleWiring/FrameworkWiring API that could make some of our code<br>
&gt; simpler.<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Thoughts? Concerns?<br>
&gt;<br>
&gt; Jarek<br>
<br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br><br clear=3D"all"><div><br></div>-- <br>=
Ivan<br>

--f46d04182558ed9cb204bc5791b1--