> move current trunk to 3.1 and change current beta branch to 3.0.
+1
As long as 3.0-beta-2 passes Java EE 1.6 tests and also provides no broken
core/primary functionality we have 2.2, we should stamp it as 3.0.
3.1 can focus on the continuation of 3.x enhancements.
-RG
On 03/28/2012 06:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com
> <mailto:genspring@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> 1.x J2EE 1.4
> 2.0 Java EE 1.5
> 2.1 Java EE 1.5
> 2.2 Java EE 1.5
> 3.0 Java EE 1.6
>
> Considering the previous practice, we'd better to move current trunk to 3.1
> and change current beta branch to 3.0.
>
> Sounds good. Any more idea?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com
> <mailto:forrestxm@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Saw this query, have an idea about the current release roadmap.
>
> 1. Can we move the current incomplete trunk work to version 4 of geronimo?
> 2. Rename 3.0-beta branch as the formal 3.0 release?
>
> Any thoughts?
>
> Forrest
>
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: *Arsen Abdrakhmanov* <arsen.abdrakhmanov@gmail.com
> <mailto:arsen.abdrakhmanov@gmail.com>>
> Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:20 PM
> Subject: Geronimo release cycle
> To: user@geronimo.apache.org <mailto:user@geronimo.apache.org>
>
>
> Dear Geronimo Team,
>
> Actually, I am the fan of geronimo for more than 5 years already.
> For the moment, I am promoting the usage of Geronimo as a platform for
> non-critical applications in our company (banking industry in KZ).
> According to our company's internal policy, only official releases of
> open-source software products can be used for internal applications.
>
> Currently, the release cycle for Geronimo is about an year or even
> longer, so it takes significant amount of time before we could use an
> updated version of software with bug fixes and enhancements.
>
> Taking that into account, can you give any information on your plans to
> accelerate the release cycle for new versions of Geronimo?
>
> I think, it would be very useful for the whole geronimo user community,
> if the releases were published at least semi-anually.
> Hope, it can also increase the popularity of Geronimo among other
> application servers.
>
> Best regards,
> Arsen Abdrakhmanov
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
>
>
>
>
> --
> Shawn
>
>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
>
|