geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From David Jencks <david_jen...@yahoo.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo release cycle
Date Wed, 28 Mar 2012 21:24:56 GMT
I do think we should release something like current beta as 3.0.  I have a slight preference
for trunk to move to 4.0; at least to 3.5.  At current rate of progress it will be a very
long time before the trunk code is really ready.

thanks
david jencks

On Mar 28, 2012, at 10:00 AM, Jarek Gawor wrote:

> I consider the changes made in trunk quite substantial so I think I
> would call trunk 4.x and call beta branch 3.x.
> 
> Jarek
> 
> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Russell E Glaue <rglaue@cait.org> wrote:
>>> move current trunk to 3.1 and change current beta branch to 3.0.
>> +1
>> 
>> As long as 3.0-beta-2 passes Java EE 1.6 tests and also provides no broken
>> core/primary functionality we have 2.2, we should stamp it as 3.0.
>> 
>> 3.1 can focus on the continuation of 3.x enhancements.
>> 
>> -RG
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> On 03/28/2012 06:46 AM, Forrest Xia wrote:
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 6:08 PM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com
>>> <mailto:genspring@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>    1.x   J2EE 1.4
>>>    2.0   Java EE 1.5
>>>    2.1  Java EE 1.5
>>>    2.2   Java EE 1.5
>>>    3.0   Java EE 1.6
>>> 
>>>    Considering the previous practice, we'd better to move current trunk to
>>> 3.1
>>>    and change current beta branch to 3.0.
>>> 
>>> Sounds good. Any more idea?
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:48 PM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com
>>>    <mailto:forrestxm@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>> 
>>>        Saw this query, have an idea about the current release roadmap.
>>> 
>>>        1. Can we move the current incomplete trunk work to version 4 of
>>> geronimo?
>>>        2. Rename 3.0-beta branch as the formal 3.0 release?
>>> 
>>>        Any thoughts?
>>> 
>>>        Forrest
>>> 
>>>        ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>        From: *Arsen Abdrakhmanov* <arsen.abdrakhmanov@gmail.com
>>>        <mailto:arsen.abdrakhmanov@gmail.com>>
>>>        Date: Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:20 PM
>>>        Subject: Geronimo release cycle
>>>        To: user@geronimo.apache.org <mailto:user@geronimo.apache.org>
>>> 
>>> 
>>>        Dear Geronimo Team,
>>> 
>>>        Actually, I am the fan of geronimo for more than 5 years already.
>>>        For the moment, I am promoting the usage of Geronimo as a platform
>>> for
>>>        non-critical applications in our company (banking industry in KZ).
>>>        According to our company's internal policy, only official releases
>>> of
>>>        open-source software products can be used for internal
>>> applications.
>>> 
>>>        Currently, the release cycle for Geronimo is about an year or even
>>>        longer, so it takes significant amount of time before we could use
>>> an
>>>        updated version of software with bug fixes and enhancements.
>>> 
>>>        Taking that into account, can you give any information on your
>>> plans to
>>>        accelerate the release cycle for new versions of Geronimo?
>>> 
>>>        I think, it would be very useful for the whole geronimo user
>>> community,
>>>        if the releases were published at least semi-anually.
>>>        Hope, it can also increase the popularity of Geronimo among other
>>>        application servers.
>>> 
>>>        Best regards,
>>>        Arsen Abdrakhmanov
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>        --
>>>        Thanks!
>>> 
>>>        Regards, Forrest
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>>    --
>>>    Shawn
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Thanks!
>>> 
>>> Regards, Forrest
>>> 
>> 


Mime
View raw message