Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9F3E0710B for ; Fri, 9 Dec 2011 07:43:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 17044 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2011 07:43:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 16984 invoked by uid 500); 9 Dec 2011 07:43:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 16974 invoked by uid 99); 9 Dec 2011 07:43:34 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:43:34 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.0 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL,URI_HEX X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: 216.139.236.26 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of elangbam.ranjan@gmail.com) Received: from [216.139.236.26] (HELO sam.nabble.com) (216.139.236.26) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 09 Dec 2011 07:43:29 +0000 Received: from ben.nabble.com ([192.168.236.152]) by sam.nabble.com with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1RYv6r-0007mv-07 for dev@geronimo.apache.org; Thu, 08 Dec 2011 23:43:09 -0800 Date: Thu, 8 Dec 2011 23:43:08 -0800 (PST) From: ranbaab To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Message-ID: <1323416588995-3572307.post@n3.nabble.com> In-Reply-To: <4EDE49CB.4030303@gmail.com> References: <1323148607238-3563502.post@n3.nabble.com> <4EDE49CB.4030303@gmail.com> Subject: Re: Geronimo redeploy issue. MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Hi all, Thanks for the reply. The Geronimo version is Little-G 2.2 with Tomcat. I have tried with shutdown script but the same behavior is observed. If I update the application module with load="false" in config.xml file then the application works fine. *snippet from geronimo.log* 2011-12-09 12:30:58,448 INFO [DirectoryHotDeployer] *Redeploying ourApplication* 2011-12-09 12:31:01,542 INFO [DirectoryMonitor] Hot deployer notified that an artifact was *removed:* ourApplication/xyz/application/war 2011-12-09 12:31:01,855 INFO [DeploymentContext] The Strict Manifest Classpath processing mode is in effect. This option can be altered by specifying -DXorg.apache.geronimo.deployment.LenientMFCP=true|false Specify ="true" for more lenient processing such as ignoring missing jars and references that are not spec compliant. 2011-12-09 12:31:24,636 INFO [StartupUtil] DWR Version 2.0.4 starting. 2011-12-09 12:31:24,636 INFO [StartupUtil] - Servlet Engine: Apache Geronimo(Embedded Tomcat/6.0.29) 2011-12-09 12:31:24,636 INFO [StartupUtil] - Java Version: 1.6.0 2011-12-09 12:31:24,636 INFO [StartupUtil] - Java Vendor: IBM Corporation 2011-12-09 12:31:24,949 ERROR [LogErrorHandler] Line=195 The content of element type "dwr" must match "(init?,allow?,signatures?)". 2011-12-09 12:31:25,355 ERROR [EngineConfigurationFactoryServlet] Unable to find config file. Creating new servlet engine config file: /WEB-INF/server-config.wsdd 2011-12-09 12:31:25,683 INFO [DirectoryHotDeployer] *Redeployed ourApplication/xyz/application/war* >From the above log, it seems that ourApplication folder from the repository cannot be deleted, because in first case, the application got hang at 2011-12-09 12:30:58,448 INFO [DirectoryHotDeployer] *Redeploying ourApplication* Thanks, Ranjan -- View this message in context: http://apache-geronimo.328035.n3.nabble.com/Geronimo-redeploy-issue-tp3563502p3572307.html Sent from the Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.