Don't know why the reply is not in the same email thread. So post the reply again.
I've cleaned the .working stuffs from the files, now they seems OK for me.
This doesn't look like a very clean merge. The "<<< .working" is certainly incorrect. Some of the LICENSE changes don't look correct to me…
On Dec 13, 2011, at 1:00 PM, email@example.com wrote:
> Modified: geronimo/server/branches/3.0-beta/LICENSE
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/geronimo/server/branches/3.0-beta/LICENSE?rev=1213810&r1=1213809&r2=1213810&view=diff
> --- geronimo/server/branches/3.0-beta/LICENSE (original)
> +++ geronimo/server/branches/3.0-beta/LICENSE Tue Dec 13 18:00:08 2011
> @@ -744,6 +744,185 @@ The file in source code is also covered
> +<<<<<<< .working
> +== Academic Free License 2.1 ==
> +The Academic Free License
> +v. 2.1
> +This Academic Free License (the "License") applies to any original