geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Cancelled [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.8
Date Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:38:33 GMT
Cancel it.

On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 9:37 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com> wrote:

>
>
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 3:49 AM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec 19, 2011 at 10:54 PM, Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Hi folks,
>>>
>>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.8 has been created and staged.
>>>
>>> The tag has been created here:
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.8/
>>>
>>> The staging repo is here:
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-367/
>>>
>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-367/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.8/geronimo-2.1.8-source-release.tar.gz
>>>
>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-367/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.8/geronimo-2.1.8-source-release.zip
>>>
>>>
>>> A tck execution against 2.1.8 tag is ongoing, and will be finished
>>> around 16 hours later. I will update the status here.
>>>
>> Java ee 5 tck  passed for both Tomcat and Jetty assembly. Now only one
>> jaxb tck failure, if we switch the jaxb api back to RI's, then no failure.
>>
> Since this jaxb tck failure, we have to revert back to use jaxb-api, not
> our geronimo jaxb spec api, so cancel this vote.
>
>>
>> Please comment if we should hold on the release until we fixed the jaxb
>> tck failure.
>>
>> My point is to go ahead to have 2.1.8 out of the door, then look for the
>> reason of the jaxb tck failure. any thoughts?
>>
>> Based on the awareness of the jaxb tck failure and the fact of all java
>> ee 5 CTS passed, my vote +1
>>
>>>
>>> The vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>>
>>> [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>> [  ]  0 no opinion
>>> [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thanks!
>>>
>>> Regards, Forrest
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Regards, Forrest
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Thanks!
>
> Regards, Forrest
>
>


-- 
Thanks!

Regards, Forrest

Mime
View raw message