geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Use version suffix for deployment plan file names
Date Thu, 06 Oct 2011 00:59:11 GMT
I think that the number should be consistent with the running Geronimo
version, and it looks to me this change is kept in the all future versions

2011/10/4 Russell E Glaue <rglaue@cait.org>

> This would be a good option to support cross version compatibility.
>
> Would the suffix remain the same for minor releases, or would we increment
> the
> version number in the suffix (i.e. geronimo-web_3.0.1.xml)?
>
> In what future version would this feature be deprecated? Or would we
> support
> this methodology in all future versions?
>
> -RG
>
>
> On 10/01/2011 02:43 AM, Ivan wrote:
> > Hi, although we are trying to make the deployment plan compatible among
> > different versions,there are still differences. e.g. some OSGi metadata
> are
> > imported in the latest 3.0 release. So, if the users would hope to use
> the same
> > application package for different versions, there may be an issue. I am
> thinking
> > that we could use version as suffix for the deployment plans. For the web
> > application, Geronimo will first try to find a geronimo-web_3.0.0.xml in
> the
> > WEB-INF directory, if not it will uses geronimo-web.xml file. With this,
> it may
> > get the life easier.
> > Thoughts ?
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
>



-- 
Ivan

Mime
View raw message