geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Geronimo directory structure & permissions
Date Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:27:45 GMT
3.0 does not have the feature like the doc for multiple instances support.
The doc needs update.

Forrest

On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 11:03 PM, Russell E Glaue <rglaue@cait.org> wrote:

> AFAIK, we still have a desire to support multiple instances per Geronimo
> base
> install.
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/GMOxDOC30/running-multiple-geronimo-instances.html
>
> We have been working towards a common configuration location in 3.0 trunk
> for
> all parts of Geronimo.
>
> I am expecting to test and use multiple instances with the 3.0 release.
>
> -RG
>
>
> On 09/20/2011 10:08 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
> > If we want to continue maintain such complexity in 3.0? Hard drive is
> pretty
> > cheap nowadays.
> >
> > And I think currently the part that looks a little bit wasting space is
> karaf
> > "copy" the artifacts from repository to cache when start..
> >
> > -Rex
> >
> > 2011/9/21 Forrest Xia <forrestxm@gmail.com <mailto:forrestxm@gmail.com>>
> >
> >     This idea is like the multiple instances feature we had in 2.1
> branch, but
> >     not supported in trunk now.
> >
> >     Geronimo 2.1.x support copying "var" folder to add more instances
> with a
> >     same installation, but G trunk code does not support that feature
> now.
> >
> >     Do we have a user scenario to mandate that feature for 3.x?
> >
> >     Regards,
> >     Forrest
> >
> >
> >     On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 1:55 AM, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com
> >     <mailto:jgawor@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >         Hi,
> >
> >         In Geronimo binary install which directories do we consider
> read-only
> >         vs. write/read? The idea is that the read-only directories could
> be
> >         shared among multiple installations to save some space and reduce
> >         maintenance.
> >
> >         Here's what I identified so far:
> >
> >         read-only:
> >          - bin
> >          - jsr88
> >          - schema
> >          - lib
> >
> >         read/write:
> >          - deploy
> >          - hotbundles
> >          - etc
> >          - var
> >
> >         The repository/ directory is a little weird because parts of it
> could
> >         be considered read-only and some write. I wonder if maybe we
> should
> >         have separate repository directories one for Geronimo bundles and
> >         another one for applications.
> >
> >         Thanks,
> >         Jarek
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Lei Wang (Rex)
> > rwonly AT apache.org <http://apache.org>
>

Mime
View raw message