geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [DISCUSSION] Geronimo 3.0 Release
Date Mon, 22 Aug 2011 06:23:37 GMT
Can we use local release dependencies for full 3.0 release too ?    If we
can,  I prefer to release 3.0 directly instead of beta.

Anyway,   it's also the time to branch something for release and then
continue the osgi integration in trunk.

On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:57 PM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>wrote:

> I'm in favor of getting a 3.0 beta out.  If anyone has time and interest to
> look into how far off jetty is that would be great, but I would prefer to
> get something out the door for tomcat that works and then see if we can
> clean up the osgi integration any more for the actual 3.0 release.
>
> thanks
> david jencks
>
> On Aug 21, 2011, at 10:51 PM, Rex Wang wrote:
>
> I would like to ship a Geronimo 3.0 Beta, it is more flexible since we can
> make the dependencies build by ourselves and make a release quickly. It is
> really long time of the Java EE 6  development procedure, we need provide a
> release to the community and get the user/market response ASAP.
>
> -Rex
>
> 2011/8/18 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>
>> All,
>> Our Tomcat Java EE 6 assembly has been passing all of the relevant Java EE
>> 6 TCK tests for a while now. IMO, it's time to start discussing release
>> plans.
>>
>> I should note that the Jetty assembly is not, currently, passing all
>> tests.
>>
>> We have multiple options:
>>
>> 1) Release a Geronimo 3.0 Beta, gain user feedback, and work towards a
>> Geonimo 3.0 release
>> 2) Release a Geronimo 3.0 release, gain user feedback, and work towards
>> future 3.0.x releases
>>
>> 1) Release Tomcat, only
>> 2) Release both Tomcat and Jetty, but only announce compliance of
>> appropriate platforms
>>
>> There are a number of SNAPSHOT dependencies. A Beta release may give us a
>> bit more flexibility in our handling of the release (e.g. we may locally
>> release some of the dependencies).
>>
>> A full 3.0 release would mean we'll need to work with other projects to
>> insure our SNAPSHOT dependencies are released (this will likely take
>> additional time).
>>
>> I expect there are other options and other issues to be considered.
>>
>> Thoughts?
>>
>> --kevan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>
>
>


-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message