Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 4600F68AC for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:57:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 65211 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2011 05:57:51 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 64790 invoked by uid 500); 12 Jul 2011 05:57:31 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 64758 invoked by uid 99); 12 Jul 2011 05:57:22 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:57:22 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of genspring@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.54] (HELO mail-ew0-f54.google.com) (209.85.215.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 05:57:15 +0000 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so2051716ewy.13 for ; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:53 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=FLhy5B9DM1p35ENBpCxxmdxwxmio/HDhDM/cu+y7fzg=; b=u61OjrTiilCDs5cAXrvI3aMO624pX2/Ud2GjmcO0fV2P246xFU6bfX3ncjyBmkotPV 1o/K5PoruesDXxk73qTOAAx3Q4dxd8goYg9xE2adJjdJ4SAyD0WMqNQiTgAnQwYogtV+ vm1sqjoDn6XboHoxlYg/UUvktuxzYLmVj4wN0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.35.205 with SMTP id q13mr1827154ebd.11.1310450213722; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:53 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.5.2 with HTTP; Mon, 11 Jul 2011 22:56:53 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2011 13:56:53 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Is it time to release YOKO 1.2 for G 3.0? From: Shawn Jiang To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1b747c1ab404a7d8f777 --0015174c1b747c1ab404a7d8f777 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 +1 David has created some tasks to track these snapshot dependencies. Yoko one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-6063 On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi All, > > I think we come to a point to determine whether to release YOKO 1.2 for G > 3.0 release. > > Since rest of YOKO related tck failures are due to RI' problem we think, I > would think we could release YOKO 1.2 now. > > If any objection, please speak out, otherwise, I start a vote for that > soon. > > Thank you for your attention. > > Forrest -- Shawn --0015174c1b747c1ab404a7d8f777 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable +1

David has created some tasks to track these snapshot dependencies= .

Yoko one: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-60= 63

On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 12:31 PM, Forrest Xi= a <forrestxm@gm= ail.com> wrote:

Hi All,

I think we come to a point to determine whether to release Y= OKO 1.2 for G 3.0 release.

Since rest of YOKO related tck failures = are due to RI' problem we think, I would think we could release YOKO 1.= 2 now.

If any objection, please speak out, otherwise, I start a vote for that = soon.

Thank you for your attention.

Forrest

--
Shawn
--0015174c1b747c1ab404a7d8f777--