Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CB5074D32 for ; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:29:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 62670 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2011 04:29:43 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 62086 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jul 2011 04:29:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 61923 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jul 2011 04:29:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:29:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.5 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of genspring@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.54] (HELO mail-ew0-f54.google.com) (209.85.215.54) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 13 Jul 2011 04:29:25 +0000 Received: by ewy1 with SMTP id 1so2532672ewy.13 for ; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:29:04 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=TENOJw3rdi41ejXC7YcIwZ28ufboqrsWK7ep0Hab2zE=; b=rWI4D4sCvS/JjnHgVCz4zm+2/DiquSrGtWUKHWIHFUsOq7sq2f2DvRQFgvgkRrJRun FzACVhnWJkhMA5DYg1GwjB+dsj6VsDMhis71syVcgKUr/at405oY9038aG3YtiqpEovy xCqeM9lY4lLa2KW1HdJIQ1z3huv/7tlYn1vVU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.35.205 with SMTP id q13mr259228ebd.11.1310531344807; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:29:04 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.213.5.2 with HTTP; Tue, 12 Jul 2011 21:29:04 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <822ECBB5-FDC0-45BC-A055-884AF930324A@gmail.com> References: <822ECBB5-FDC0-45BC-A055-884AF930324A@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 12:29:04 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. From: Shawn Jiang To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c1b7446368104a7ebdb57 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0015174c1b7446368104a7ebdb57 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan Miller wrote: > Looks good with one exception. > > geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains: > > Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation > > Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be > 2011. Just updated latter date to 2011 for all notice files in geronimo bundles. > Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix. Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ? > Neither of these are a hard requirement. But given the number of releases > that we'll have coming up, may as well cleanup now... > > Beyond the above, source, signatures/checksums, and build -- all look good > to me. With the above minor concerns, I'm +0. > > --kevan > > On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote: > > > [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt. > > > > This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for > GERONIMO-5848 > > > > The components up for vote are: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.zip > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1-source-release.tar.gz > > > > > > The staging repository is: > > > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/ > > > > The source repo is: > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/ > > > > Vote will be open for 72 hours. > > > > [ ] +1 approve > > [ ] +0 no opinion > > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why) > > > > -- > > Shawn > > -- Shawn --0015174c1b7446368104a7ebdb57 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Kevan = Miller <keva= n.miller@gmail.com> wrote:
Looks good with one exception.

geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/NOTICE.txt contains:

Copyright 2003-2006 The Apache Software Foundation

Not a hard requirement, but by our convention the latter date should be 201= 1.

Just updated latter date to 2011 for al= l notice files in geronimo bundles.
=A0
Also, most of our LICENSE/NOTICE files no longer have the .txt suffix.

Do you mean we need to rename LICENSE/NOTICE to= LICENSE.txt/NOTICE.txt ?

=A0
Neither of these are a hard requirement. But given the number of releases t= hat we'll have coming up, may as well cleanup now...

Beyond the above, source, signatures/checksums, and build -- all look good = to me. With the above minor concerns, I'm +0.

--kevan

On Jul 12, 2011, at 11:18 AM, Shawn Jiang wrote:

> [VOTE] release StAX 1.2 spec version 1.1 - 2nd attempt.
>
> This is a bug fix release that only includes one bug fix for GERONIMO-= 5848
>
> The components up for vote are:
>
> https://re= pository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apache/g= eronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1= -source-release.zip
> https:/= /repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/org/apach= e/geronimo/specs/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec/1.1/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-= 1.1-source-release.tar.gz
>
>
> The staging repository is:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep= ositories/orgapachegeronimo-019/
>
> The source repo is:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/a= sf/geronimo/specs/tags/geronimo-stax-api_1.2_spec-1.1/
>
> =A0Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> =A0[ ] +1 =A0approve
> =A0[ ] +0 =A0no opinion
> =A0[ ] -1 =A0disapprove (and reason why)
>
> --
> Shawn




--
Shawn
--0015174c1b7446368104a7ebdb57--