geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Support inPlace deployment and shareLib in Geronimo 3.0 ?
Date Thu, 28 Jul 2011 10:59:16 GMT
I totally agree that they are very good functionalities we want.

But the Geronimo 3.0 TCK now is in a good shape,  considering the possible
impact to the TCK,   I would suggest we dive into this the until 3.1 is
branched.

On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi, since it is possible to point to a directory with reference style URL,
> I am thinking that we might consider to support inPlace deployment and
> ShareLib.
>
> For inPlace deployment, in the past, a file inPlaceLocation.config will be
> created  in the target META-INF folder, which keeps the real location of the
> deployed application. In Geronimo 3.0, I am thinking to use the similar way
> to do this, the difference is that some installation codes are required to
> updated, e.g. If it detects a inPlaceLocation.config file, a reference URL
> is constructed to install the bundle, other the mvn style. Also, those
> serialized files like config.ser might need to be saved in the application's
> directory, not the corresponding folder in the repository, which we did in
> the past. One of the concern is that, some codes always assume the locations
> of the bundles are of mvn style, might need to make them work with reference
> URL.
>
> Shared library is a hot topic, and we have discussed it for many times in
> the past. Yes, I agree that the way of shared library breaks the OSGi
> classloading style. But, if searching our mail list, you might find many
> users have asked for it. Although Geronimo provides ways to install library
> in the repository, guess that no one have the patience to install all the
> dependent jar files in the repository and add the dependencies in the
> deployment plan. The idea is that, a new bundle will be started in the
> sharedlib GBean, also, that bundle will be added to the list of the
> delegating bundle. Except for the useEnvironemnt flag, it is also required
> to use delegating bundle once the configuration or its parent contains
> shared lib gbean. I am thinking that we might record some information in the
> data area in the bundle.
>
> Just some rough ideas,  not sure whether they work, also not sure whether
> there is still time to do this and what is effect to current components.
> Thoughts ?
> Thanks.
> --
> Ivan
>



-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message