Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87167 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 17:05:41 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 17:05:41 -0000 Received: (qmail 70272 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 17:05:41 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 70069 invoked by uid 500); 16 Feb 2011 17:05:39 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 70060 invoked by uid 99); 16 Feb 2011 17:05:39 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:05:39 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [98.136.44.62] (HELO smtp107.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com) (98.136.44.62) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Feb 2011 17:05:32 +0000 Received: (qmail 47566 invoked from network); 16 Feb 2011 17:05:11 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=DKIM-Signature:Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer; b=Zih8OXl6xWT7J9+mPbr285Ac4qZ4bS17Elvvo+uBLz3rZAC6ghDfVZ+b0aAgDdNNCL1A+JElIA/k24MQsOcKX8nUYhCo8DH90WOObuzeF/Jds7P4nqmMRhGxIaUj91GsRF9nNigTqR8DtNY7J0jsSqbKAXDQ2BUYA5K2JQUoeJ8= ; DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.com; s=s1024; t=1297875911; bh=3yHw3rqZulDX48FrWcTFlGB9yRyTdqzl9cIswqKiIno=; h=Received:X-Yahoo-SMTP:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer; b=l4GsN8ilMXSMPGRArQnkwvHoJtQxdKRa9Y2PEb7Q32J0ydmpe3NnRRsQU2uxjz4TpRppOna3/SVWCT9UMh0bpImyjdMWDU2O3j9DPjE6orWsSPeKi2yyhhYd8pfKy8SyFgd33q1AFm5AMZ26KKo8dCLCVmPF7AKThPTXJgyURJw= Received: from [10.0.1.147] (david_jencks@76.76.148.215 with plain) by smtp107.prem.mail.sp1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 16 Feb 2011 09:05:11 -0800 PST X-Yahoo-SMTP: .9oIUzyswBANsYgUm_5uPui0skTnzGJXJQ-- X-YMail-OSG: gG5bKhIVM1kmaH8yhRtkozgdfPl6f60STt5Bx2yJOZVSRLu W05Y6a0hAs259iz2xPp1JYKpjSOAGE8BmyVxVZMAuINH2TiZJ2gZb3OTsYDB n_dsEDyZsM_M5nn3UCaInadFMV7j4TVLmKio9k3a.VViP_rm0l.p4TinT4eF lSuhnYH5mmMfRCziokE.wogWOf7Yfo2IxHjjTCxfo4Svu7dN3HK0.tzJFzQP VAmsxfWeii2ANdZI6g2sT.nl4iGCVPh_BfEEAX7Dv01iRANOlOD64TclDaoN _1P1S145KBtxAmLive_HsTPdjXGM- X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Seems current EJB part of geronimo is not compatible with EJB 2.1 requirements. From: David Jencks In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 16 Feb 2011 09:05:10 -0800 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) Could you ping the tck list with the packages or names of some of these = tests that fail like this? thanks david jencks On Feb 16, 2011, at 8:36 AM, Forrest Xia wrote: > Hi, >=20 > I see some tck cases related to EJB 2.1 compatibility are failed with = this exception: >=20 > 02-16-2011 23:49:41: ERROR: javax.naming.NotContextException: = comp/env/ejb/TestBean > at = org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.jav= a:165) > at = org.apache.xbean.naming.context.AbstractContext.lookup(AbstractContext.jav= a:605) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.JndiRequestHandler.doLookup(JndiRequestHand= ler.java:188) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.JndiRequestHandler.processRequest(JndiReque= stHandler.java:129) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbDaemon.processJndiRequest(EjbDaemon.java= :200) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbDaemon.service(EjbDaemon.java:153) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbServer.service(EjbServer.java:71) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.KeepAliveServer$Session.service(KeepAliveSe= rver.java:213) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.KeepAliveServer.service(KeepAliveServer.jav= a:233) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ejbd.EjbServer.service(EjbServer.java:66) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ServicePool$2.run(ServicePool.java:91) > at = org.apache.openejb.server.ServicePool$3.run(ServicePool.java:120) > at = java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.runTask(ThreadPoolExecutor.= java:886) > at = java.util.concurrent.ThreadPoolExecutor$Worker.run(ThreadPoolExecutor.java= :908) > at java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:662) >=20 > The exception sounds to me that the EJB 2.1 style object is not = correctly initialized in geronimo ejb container.=20 >=20 > However, from the server.log, I can see the EJB test app are = successfully deployed and seems the EJBs are initialized susscessfully.=20= >=20 > Any EJB expert can help look into this issue? Lots of traditional ejb = cases are failed with the same exception. >=20 > Thanks in advance! >=20 > Forrest