geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Is GeronimoMappedName still required ?
Date Tue, 22 Feb 2011 05:27:03 GMT
Thanks for the background introduction, David. I will investigate it more
before doing any change.

2011/2/22 David Blevins <david.blevins@gmail.com>

> We may not need it if we prune out the things from the JNDI tree we don't
> want OpenEJB to build.
>
> We used to use it as a way to merge the OpenEJB built JNDI tree with the
> Geronimo built one.  The OpenEJB one was in "front" and the Geronimo one was
> in back.  So the OpenEJB tree had links to all the Geronimo tree items
> Geronimo wanted to control.  Now it's the reverse.
>
> -David
>
> On Feb 21, 2011, at 5:57 PM, Ivan wrote:
>
> > OK, seems that no one remembered that history, I also noticed that file
> is
> > added long long ago. I think that the only way is to remove it, and check
> > whether everything still works well.
> >
> > 2011/2/19 Ivan <xhhsld@gmail.com>
> >
> >> Hi,
> >> I found a GeronimoMappedName in the EJB deployment chain, and it will
> >> configure the mapped name for some of jndi staff. Seems that mapped name
> is
> >> used to configured server specified jndi name, but I did not find the
> >> configured jndi:java:comp/geronimo/env/ namespace in Geronimo JNDI tree
> now
> >> (From the history, it seems that that tree is created in the
> >> EJBDeploymentGBean in the past). I am wondering that do we still require
> it
> >> ? As it will configure the resource refer to an nonexisting place.
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> --
> >> Ivan
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ivan
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Mime
View raw message