geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Shawn Jiang <genspr...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [Discussion] WAB Deployment Way
Date Wed, 19 Jan 2011 08:52:21 GMT
We need to do more discuss with this thread.

On Mon, Sep 27, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Jarek Gawor <jgawor@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 10:29 PM, viola lu <viola.lu@gmail.com> wrote:
> > From https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5588, currenlty WAB
> is
> > deployed via osgi: install, or packaged in EAB , then deployed via admin
> > console. If it's deployed via admin console, it's recognized as WAR,
> shall
> > we keep current way in future? Or will enable WBA deployment via admin
> > console and deployer tool?
>
> WAB is really just a bundle. What we should support is installation of
> a bundle through the admin console and/or command line tool. I think
> there might already be a JIRA open for that.
> What I'm not sure about is if WAB, EBA, and any other Java EE
> application installation should happen through the existing Deployer
> in the admin console or if we should have separate installers for
> OSGI-based archives (WAB, EBA) and Java EE applications (EAR, WAR,
> etc.)
>
> > Also there is another question here: WAB is a bundle, its classpath can
> be
> > set via bundle classpath or use default classpath( classes keep the same
> > level with WEB-INF:,  but it's also a JavaEE application, whose default
> > classpath is "classes or lib are under the subfolder of WEB-INF, this is
> > defined in RFC 66. If as definition in RFC 66, osgi: install won't load
> > classes under WEB-INF in WAB. Or shall we support both?
>
> Yes, it will. The bundle classpath header just needs to be set correctly.
>
> Jarek
>



-- 
Shawn

Mime
View raw message