geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Rex Wang <rwo...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Bad 2.2.1 release
Date Wed, 05 Jan 2011 04:47:31 GMT
Verified.

the one
http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gzis
correct.

So we need replace the wrong one in dist.

-Rex

2011/1/5 Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com>

> I remember I did clean the local repo before making 221 release artifacts.
> I checked the openejb-core in my local repo and it is the one of 12 Nov,
> so I think the
> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
> might be different from the one in maven public repo which promoted from
> staging repo
> http://repo2.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/geronimo/assemblies/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>
> I am downloading it to verify...
>
> -Rex
>
> 2011/1/5 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>
>
>> On Jan 4, 2011, at 4:44 PM, David Blevins wrote:
>>
>> > Looks like our 2.2.1 release does not contain the final OpenEJB 3.1.4
>> binaries and instead contains older binaries from a release vote that never
>> passed.
>> >
>> > $ cd /tmp
>> > $ wget -q
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> > $ tar xzf geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1-bin.tar.gz
>> > $ jar tvf
>> /tmp/geronimo-tomcat6-javaee5-2.2.1/repository/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>> | tail
>> >   562 Sun Oct 31 21:28:14 PDT 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>> >  7379 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>> >  6545 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>> >  2882 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>> >    32 Sun Oct 31 21:28:10 PDT 2010 users.properties
>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/
>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>> >     0 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>> > 14964 Sun Oct 31 20:57:22 PDT 2010
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>> >   115 Sun Oct 31 21:33:30 PDT 2010
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>> >
>> > $ wget -q -U Maven
>> http://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/apache/openejb/openejb-core/3.1.4/openejb-core-3.1.4.jar
>> > $ jar tvf openejb-core-3.1.4.jar | tail
>> >   562 Fri Nov 12 15:32:08 PST 2010 org/openejb/OpenEJB.class
>> >  7379 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb-jar.xsd
>> >  6545 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/openejb.xsd
>> >  2882 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 schema/service-jar.xsd
>> >    32 Fri Nov 12 15:32:06 PST 2010 users.properties
>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/
>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010 META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/
>> >     0 Fri Nov 12 15:32:14 PST 2010
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/
>> > 14964 Fri Nov 12 15:12:40 PST 2010
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.xml
>> >   115 Fri Nov 12 15:32:12 PST 2010
>> META-INF/maven/org.apache.openejb/openejb-core/pom.properties
>> >
>> >
>> > Unfortunately that old openejb-3.1.4 binary contains this bug:
>> >
>> >  https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENEJB-1394
>> >
>> > We'll definitely need another 2.2.x release of some kind.  Whether or
>> not we want to include any other fixes is probably a good discussion to
>> have.
>>
>> Yep. Thanks for finding that... Seems like we need to update our release
>> process to include a "delete your local maven repository" step... Or some
>> other precaution to prevent this from happening.
>>
>> --kevan
>
>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>



-- 
Lei Wang (Rex)
rwonly AT apache.org

Mime
View raw message