Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 19023 invoked from network); 7 Dec 2010 18:05:47 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Dec 2010 18:05:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 91429 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:05:46 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91268 invoked by uid 500); 7 Dec 2010 18:05:46 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 91261 invoked by uid 99); 7 Dec 2010 18:05:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:05:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of kevan.miller@gmail.com designates 74.125.83.49 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.83.49] (HELO mail-gw0-f49.google.com) (74.125.83.49) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 18:05:37 +0000 Received: by gwj20 with SMTP id 20so185504gwj.36 for ; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:05:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=DedBBqJLtZbK0nI5VPlbXMzlHb0QsJoZBv/hjWAc5bU=; b=wqn4gDlST2ZE4OetHQcigTYz1eJMpB8kRDKXrnTKvKpM/AAQPehGfhvbXjaKbfnhvd OW6inX6CRCMEpllpVB9XGN8ijshnjZoKCDvo2DCo6/4Ks37kaJsjaD3bVRK8vEEoCK+T L1oQyt2RdBogb8lWtVTk0NIcLSGwTeRN1GZ88= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=oruBNIhBhRqLHYhJW3G3Hi/bXjgiCQ1ACKK/eQg8m452aIPKx1hYh69K05hLdKVZg1 uXNU+6z/TalFrvRtJ8mc+3NufXjiz2DmsUZsXLfn0mc8yu864856bMVOfQUBR+It3J61 JLwUMSxkh1zM4JOnoBgYBe+BUCbCwYtpcPlBU= Received: by 10.151.148.7 with SMTP id a7mr2384578ybo.15.1291745115876; Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:05:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from [10.0.1.200] (cpe-066-057-037-066.nc.res.rr.com [66.57.37.66]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id v4sm311000ybe.17.2010.12.07.10.05.13 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 07 Dec 2010 10:05:14 -0800 (PST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Subject: Re: Are we getting close to being able to have a 3.0-M2 release? From: Kevan Miller In-Reply-To: <1291739313241-2034461.post@n3.nabble.com> Date: Tue, 7 Dec 2010 13:05:12 -0500 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <9113AE57-B76D-4B92-AAAC-EC5D6B2ADB6B@gmail.com> References: <4CBF35C0.1090600@gmail.com> <1291739313241-2034461.post@n3.nabble.com> To: dev@geronimo.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Dec 7, 2010, at 11:28 AM, raboyles wrote: >=20 > Is there an indication of a upcoming vote for the 3.0 M2 release? I am > interested to determine if M2 will be available in January 2011. = Thanks! Not in the immediate future. We're still ironing out TCK issues. I would = expect to see an M2 soon, but couldn't give you a specific date... --kevan=