geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.2.1
Date Thu, 09 Dec 2010 08:57:30 GMT
Try this config in your apache httpd.conf:

LoadModule proxy_module modules/mod_proxy.so
LoadModule proxy_ajp_module modules/mod_proxy_ajp.so

<IfModule mod_proxy.c>
ProxyPass /console ajp://localhost:8009/console
ProxyPass /dojo ajp://localhost:8009/dojo
ProxyPassReverse / ajp://localhost:8009/
</IfModule>

Forrest

On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 4:41 PM, Johannes Weberhofer <
jweberhofer@weberhofer.at> wrote:

> I have investigated the problem and have found out, that the
> geronimo-server itself works nicely.  When I access it directly via port
> 8080, there are no problems at all.
>
> In my (test) environment I'm accessing geronimo via apace ajp as reverse
> proxy; in this case, the complete left menu is not there (btw. I had to add
> /dojo/ to the proxied directories).
>
> In the direct connection, I see an empty left hand menu and no other items
> when I turn JavaScript off. So I guess, it's a problem related to rendering
> with Javascript? Do the Portlets produce other code when accesses via ajp?
>
> Johannes
>
> Am 09.12.10 05:37, schrieb Jay D. McHugh:
>
>  When I built from source, the menu initially showed up collapsed.
>>
>> Is that what you are seeing?
>>
>> Jay
>>
>> On 12/08/2010 05:20 PM, Johannes Weberhofer wrote:
>>
>>> Strange - I could compile+start the packages without problems, but in
>>> both -javaee5 (tomcat and jetty) packages I do not have any menu at the
>>> left hand /console/portal/ interface.
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Johannes
>>>
>>> Am 08.12.10 19:13, schrieb Jay D. McHugh:
>>>
>>>> When I build and start the Tomcat JavaEE server I do not have the
>>>> database pools menu choice. I am looking under 'services'.
>>>>
>>>> Did it move?
>>>>
>>>> As confirmation I am double checking the prebuilt bin on the staging
>>>> site.
>>>>
>>>> Please do not call the vote until I have a chance to confirm whether
>>>> this is a problem or not.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>>
>>>> Jay
>>>>
>>>> On 12/03/2010 09:20 PM, Shawn Jiang wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> A release candidate for Geronimo 2.2.1 has been created and staged.
>>>>>
>>>>> The tag has been created here:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.2.1/
>>>>>
>>>>> The staging repo is here:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-048
>>>>>
>>>>> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-048/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-2.2.1-source-release.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-048/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.2.1/geronimo-2.2.1-source-release.zip
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> The vote will be open for the 72-hour minimum.
>>>>>
>>>>> [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>>>>> [ ] 0 no opinion
>>>>> [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why)
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
> --
> Johannes Weberhofer
> Weberhofer GmbH, Austria, Vienna
>

Mime
View raw message