Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59218 invoked from network); 29 Nov 2010 06:44:19 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 29 Nov 2010 06:44:19 -0000 Received: (qmail 25007 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 06:44:18 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24871 invoked by uid 500); 29 Nov 2010 06:44:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 24864 invoked by uid 99); 29 Nov 2010 06:44:15 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:44:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.2 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of rwonly@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.50 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.50] (HELO mail-ww0-f50.google.com) (74.125.82.50) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 29 Nov 2010 06:44:09 +0000 Received: by wwb24 with SMTP id 24so326906wwb.31 for ; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:43:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:mime-version:received:in-reply-to :references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; bh=W6N1B3rqy+zRkD2rm/nq6Gf1APzGBnQAZtlBFmxvrrU=; b=AYZTxCUZE8IRDnxFUD4633p/Mh0Rjmto+fPkw+GnBKOQf5Y1NQjFH84iSXZU3nAQ2q D5ks6cS+iiZfoNCDJoi/ErrxgtB6MjD0/jjEhd7bF7ibu+1mqNzuUVj18d8bt26go2YZ 7DiLCCtkaWdt8Do5TTpYFVUI9rRsJ5bGApCa0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; b=U+eXhjzjt1l6c5ukbWDqbt7NW+H4kA3IV1B2QQ8ObkcuEEnsnduTbY5ntuqenCsdTe 3jID54/Pl+sGLbHhrFmEro03E8Gzqekyf4eeFpqCzrI8e2kn5YHiu3zrlJqMWk9ps7XH 8LLicNEykFLPBJ0Wo0wWEPnK142MTlllJReZM= Received: by 10.216.239.199 with SMTP id c49mr4572235wer.12.1291013027873; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:43:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.49.78 with HTTP; Sun, 28 Nov 2010 22:43:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: From: Rex Wang Date: Mon, 29 Nov 2010 14:43:27 +0800 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.7 (2nd try) To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=e0cb4e43b2a3ed42bd04962b64d1 --e0cb4e43b2a3ed42bd04962b64d1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 hi If no objections, I will close the vote in 11/30/2010 (Planned Proposed Announce date, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.7+Release+Status ) -Rex 2010/11/26 Ashish Jain > Build runs fine. Some basic tests are fine. My +1. > > > On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:55 PM, Rex Wang wrote: > >> Thank you, Shawn! >> >> 2010/11/26 Shawn Jiang >> >> +1 >>> >>> server/jaxb/stax tck 100% passed. >>> >>> On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Rex Wang wrote: >>> > Hi Devs, >>> > >>> > The 2nd release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.7 has been created and >>> staged. >>> > >>> > The tag has been created here: >>> > >>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.7/ >>> > >>> > The staging repo is here: >>> > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/ >>> > >>> > The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives: >>> > >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-source-release.tar.gz >>> > >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-source-release.zip >>> > >>> > We have to verify the binaries pass the tck again, so the vote may be >>> open >>> > for longer than the 72-hour minimum. >>> > >>> > [ ] +1 about time to push this out the door >>> > [ ] 0 no opinion >>> > [ ] -1 not this one (please explain why) >>> > >>> > -- >>> > Lei Wang (Rex) >>> > rwonly AT apache.org >>> > >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Shawn >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Lei Wang (Rex) >> rwonly AT apache.org >> > > -- Lei Wang (Rex) rwonly AT apache.org --e0cb4e43b2a3ed42bd04962b64d1 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable hi

If no objections, I will close the vote in 11/30/2010 (Planned Pr= oposed Announce date, https://cwiki.apache.org/confluen= ce/display/GMOxPMGT/Geronimo+2.1.7+Release+Status)

-Rex

2010/11/26 Ashish Jain <ashjain2@gmail.com&g= t;
Build runs fine. Some basic tests are fine. My +1.


On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 12:55 P= M, Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you, Shawn!=

2010/11/26 Shawn Jiang <genspring@gma= il.com>

+1

server/jaxb/stax tck 100% passed.

On Wed, Nov 24, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Devs,
>
> The 2nd release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.7 has been created and stag= ed.
>
> The tag has been created here:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/ser= ver/tags/geronimo-2.1.7/
>
> The staging repo is here:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/rep= ositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
>
> The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/reposit= ories/orgapachegeronimo-016/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1= .7-source-release.tar.gz
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositori= es/orgapachegeronimo-016/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-= source-release.zip
>
> We have to verify the binaries pass the tck again, so the vote may be = open
> for longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>
> [=A0 ] +1 about time to push this out the door
> [=A0 ]=A0 0 no opinion
> [=A0 ] -1 not this one=A0 (please explain why)
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>



--
Shawn



--




--
Lei Wang (R= ex)
rwonly AT apache.org
--e0cb4e43b2a3ed42bd04962b64d1--