Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 23584 invoked from network); 2 Nov 2010 06:31:14 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 2 Nov 2010 06:31:14 -0000 Received: (qmail 9858 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 06:31:45 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-geronimo-dev-archive@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9803 invoked by uid 500); 2 Nov 2010 06:31:45 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@geronimo.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk list-help: list-unsubscribe: List-Post: Reply-To: dev@geronimo.apache.org List-Id: Delivered-To: mailing list dev@geronimo.apache.org Received: (qmail 9796 invoked by uid 99); 2 Nov 2010 06:31:45 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:31:45 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=4.4 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of ashjain2@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.182 as permitted sender) Received: from [74.125.82.182] (HELO mail-wy0-f182.google.com) (74.125.82.182) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 02 Nov 2010 06:31:37 +0000 Received: by wyb42 with SMTP id 42so6317083wyb.13 for ; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:31:17 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wOvsD/Po6Yxbx3aBHqnfORXdHMXhhT0wBtsOIKOKEqI=; b=sCbWm1rHEOtFJ8WEytBRAxtlRj3dobXnh/hWFipx1sfPuRL0xB6Yp07HcU2g9K5cmt sUPD6Z5T0ytcNWBYWFLczKsVo98I9rjpwKc8iZw26sWIzdS0FCAxcnrjvvm2TJ64HadX WXzPhwAnBPjzUZKfdxUPw/TgJkEQCoMKkasVk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=e852sWqTVX480iBXAYfuEQ7AIr2CuJjjuyqc31UPbANimPN8MjbPtMjGiocFz+djrq Kv6Io3lYor+t3eIsAF7eXc2puqPiwFZ5VicRTf0ZIKvJjb6AcVY3mvwwRvZzzpldOvk4 ekGIbccHpq43+VJvL7XBFoCZbDj/pibACcLz0= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.216.22.74 with SMTP id s52mr620734wes.11.1288679477331; Mon, 01 Nov 2010 23:31:17 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.241.68 with HTTP; Mon, 1 Nov 2010 23:31:17 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2010 12:01:17 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: move tranql to java 1.6? From: Ashish Jain To: dev@geronimo.apache.org Cc: dev@tranql.codehaus.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0016364d1b8d79c90504940c12d7 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org --0016364d1b8d79c90504940c12d7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Hi David, Is the problem you are facing due to TQL-26? We also need to have a release of Tranql ra for DB2 on Iseries which is addressed through TQL-22. Thanks Ashish On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:37 AM, David Jencks wrote: > I've been unable to compile tranql to try out a couple patches and release > since apple removed java 1.5 from my mac and I haven't figured out how to > get it back yet. > > Perhaps its time to move tranql to java 1.6 with the new methods on the sql > interfaces? I'd assume we'd keep java 1.5 compatible class format. There's > a patch that I think does this, although it looks like it has some > additional problems that would need ironing out. > > Does anyone know if this will create problems running tranql on java 1.5 > with java 1.5 compliant drivers? > > thanks > david jencks > > --0016364d1b8d79c90504940c12d7 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi David,

Is the problem you are facing due to TQL-26? We also need = to have a release of Tranql ra for DB2 on Iseries which is addressed throug= h TQL-22.

Thanks
Ashish

On Tue= , Nov 2, 2010 at 9:37 AM, David Jencks <david_jencks@yahoo.com>= ; wrote:
I've been una= ble to compile tranql to try out a couple patches and release since apple r= emoved java 1.5 from my mac and I haven't figured out how to get it bac= k yet.

Perhaps its time to move tranql to java 1.6 with the new methods on the sql= interfaces? =A0I'd assume we'd keep java 1.5 compatible class form= at. =A0There's a patch that I think does this, although it looks like i= t has some additional problems that would need ironing out.

Does anyone know if this will create problems running tranql on java 1.5 wi= th java 1.5 compliant drivers?

thanks
david jencks


--0016364d1b8d79c90504940c12d7--