geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Delos <dait...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Strange GEP branch versions.
Date Mon, 08 Nov 2010 14:13:48 GMT
I don't know the reason either, seems it's a convention for GEP from version
1.2.1. You may make it the same as server, I think.

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 11:21 PM, Ted Kirby <ted.kirby@gmail.com> wrote:

> I had the same question, tho I never asked it.  I think the branches
> should be named 2.1 and 2.2 as well.  As Kevan points out, this works
> for server.  I think GEP should do it this way too.
>
> Ted
>
> On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/
> >
> >    * ..
> >    * 2.1.7/
> >    * 2.2.1/
> >
> >  Is there any special reasons that we have to use this kind of version
> way ?
> >
> > I think we should name them 2.1 and 2.2 instead of 2.1.7 and 2.2.1.
> > Upgrade the branch name for each release will lose the full svn
> > history view of a branch.
> > --
> > Shawn
> >
>



-- 
Best Regards,

Delos

Mime
View raw message