geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Forrest Xia <forres...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] Release Geronimo 2.1.7 (2nd try)
Date Thu, 25 Nov 2010 08:59:37 GMT
+1

Forrest

On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Rex Wang <rwonly@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> Thank you, Kevan.
>
> For all the information,
> During deal with the release, I found the maven rat plugin(1.0-alpha-3,
> latest) seems have some bugs to me.
> 1. incorrect number of unapproved licenses reported by rat:check. This
> should be resolved in 1.0-alpha-4, but it has not released yet..(
> http://incubator.apache.org/rat/apache-rat-plugin/changes-report.html)
>
> 2. If I designated the profile, for example -Pall-subprojects, rat:check
> won't run in any of the subprojects.
>     If I designated -Pno-it, rat:check will run only in testsuite
> subproject.
>     If I designated -Ptools, which does not contain any subprojects, it
> will run in all subprojects.
>    So, the program logic is inverted.. I have to use -Ptools to do
> rat:check..
>
> HTH
>
> -Rex
>
> 2010/11/25 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>
>
> Here's my +1.
>>
>> Source, signatures/checksums, build, and random testing -- all look good
>> to me. Thanks Rex!
>>
>> --kevan
>> On Nov 24, 2010, at 4:23 AM, Rex Wang wrote:
>>
>> > Hi Devs,
>> >
>> > The 2nd release candidate for Geronimo 2.1.7 has been created and
>> staged.
>> >
>> > The tag has been created here:
>> >
>> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/server/tags/geronimo-2.1.7/
>> >
>> > The staging repo is here:
>> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/
>> >
>> > The main artifacts up for vote are the source release archives:
>> >
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-source-release.tar.gz
>> >
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-016/org/apache/geronimo/geronimo/2.1.7/geronimo-2.1.7-source-release.zip
>> >
>> > We have to verify the binaries pass the tck again, so the vote may be
>> open for longer than the 72-hour minimum.
>> >
>> > [  ] +1 about time to push this out the door
>> > [  ]  0 no opinion
>> > [  ] -1 not this one  (please explain why)
>> >
>> > --
>> > Lei Wang (Rex)
>> > rwonly AT apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Lei Wang (Rex)
> rwonly AT apache.org
>

Mime
View raw message