geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ted Kirby <ted.ki...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Strange GEP branch versions.
Date Fri, 05 Nov 2010 15:21:44 GMT
I had the same question, tho I never asked it.  I think the branches
should be named 2.1 and 2.2 as well.  As Kevan points out, this works
for server.  I think GEP should do it this way too.

Ted

On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 6:36 AM, Shawn Jiang <genspring@gmail.com> wrote:
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/devtools/eclipse-plugin/branches/
>
>    * ..
>    * 2.1.7/
>    * 2.2.1/
>
>  Is there any special reasons that we have to use this kind of version way ?
>
> I think we should name them 2.1 and 2.2 instead of 2.1.7 and 2.2.1.
> Upgrade the branch name for each release will lose the full svn
> history view of a branch.
> --
> Shawn
>

Mime
View raw message