geronimo-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Ivan <xhh...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: [VOTE] release javamail 1.8.2 provider and mail components.
Date Tue, 14 Sep 2010 02:55:06 GMT
I am thinking that we should build it by jdk 1.5.

2010/9/14 Kevan Miller <kevan.miller@gmail.com>

> Rick,
> Source, signature, checksum, build -- all look good.  Here's my +1.
>
> One note, your source release is:
>
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.tar.gz
> or
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2-source-release.zip
>
> Your note refers to the source jars that are, IMO, not appropriate as
> release artifacts. The above artifact (tar.gz) is what I've reviewed and am
> voting on.
>
> --kevan
>
>
> On Sep 10, 2010, at 8:04 AM, Rick McGuire wrote:
>
> > This is a bug fix release to fix a problem with the javamail smtp
> provider including the BCC recipients as a header in sent messages.  The
> JIRA in question is
> >
> > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-5587
> >
> > This is a vote for the javamail providers and combined mail jar.  This
> fix did not require an update to the javamail specs. .
> >
> > The 2 components up for vote are:
> >
> >
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_mail-1.8.2-sources.jar
> >
> org/apache/geronimo/javamail/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider/1.8.2/geronimo-javamail_1.4_provider-1.8.2-sources.jar
> >
> > from the staging repository at:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachegeronimo-008/
> >
> > The source repo is:
> >
> >
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/javamail/tags/geronimo-javamail_1.4-1.8.2/
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1  approve
> > [ ] +0  no opinion
> > [ ] -1  disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Rick
> >
>
>


-- 
Ivan

Mime
View raw message